How Can Humanity Become a Kardashev Type 1 Civilization?

Thank you to Anydesk for supporting PBS Imagine a world where humanity masters  every planetary resource available to it—our first step on the famous Kardeshev  scale of technological advancement. How distant is that step? Will we even become a true  Type-1 civilization, and how can we get there?

In 1964  Soviet physicist Nikolai Kardashev  proposed a method for measuring the technological advancement of a civilization. The Kardashev scale  has become a go-to metric for what technologically advanced civilization might be capable of. It’s  based on amount of energy commanded —with a Type I Civilisation controlling access to all available  energy on a planetary scale, a Type 2 accessing an entire star’s energy output, and a Type 3  harnessing energy from a galactic scale.

Fun side note: Kardashev originally came up with this scale  in a paper discussing the detectability of alien civilizations, because the distance over which an  alien broadcast might be detectable depends on how much energy is pumped into that transmission. Despite this modest intended application, the whole idea of the Kardashev scale really  captured the imagination of both scientists and science fiction-ists. Exponential advancement on a  cosmological timescale implies frighteningly vast differences between between civilizations born at  different times, and Kardeshev captures that.

Type 2 and 3 civilizations—mastery of one or many stars  respectively—are the stuff of extreme sci-fi—we’re talking Dyson spheres, black hole engines,  artificial worlds, galactic empires, and warping the fabric of space for fun. By comparison,  the Type 1 civilization is just getting started. Maybe it’s traveled to the nearest star  systems and terraformed a planet or two at best.

Humans would be Type 0. Maybe 0. 5 at best.

But if  we hope to one day become a super-civilisation; roaming the galaxy, mastering the  fundamental constituents of reality, and finally making contact with the aliens who  have been waiting for us to graduate technology preschool… we need to start somewhere. And that  means becoming a Type I civilisation. So what’s it going to take for us to get there.

There’s a lot more to becoming a stable super-civilization than energy  consumption—including some messy geopolitical stuff that I’m neither qualified nor  have time to cover in a short YouTube video—so today we’re going to stick to Kardeshev’s  simple criterion and ask what will it take to attain the defining energy resources of a Type I. In that 1964 paper, Kardeshev actually says that humanity is close to the technological level of  a Type 1 civilization and defines a Type 1 power capacity at roughly the current level. But he was  speaking quite loosely, and these days we tend to think of Type I as already having access to  planetary-scale energy resources—which is a factor of 10,000 times higher than what we currently use. 

So that’s the thought experiment for today—what does it take to master planet-scale energy. Let’s attach a number to that statement. How much energy can we access from the safety of  our home planet?

We want a stable civilization, so we’re just going to consider renewable  sources. Besides, a proper Type 1 would burn all of the energy locked up in Earth’s  fossil fuels and accessible fissionable material like uranium in a couple of days. Renewable sources like wind and waves contain a lot of energy, but the amount is piddling  compared to the amount of solar energy that hits the Earth.

And that makes sense—ultimately,  almost every source of energy in the atmosphere or biosphere comes from the Sun. So we actually  have a very easy way to estimate the energy use of a Type-1 civilization—it’s the amount of solar  energy hitting the entire planet every day. And directly collecting solar energy may also be the  easiest way to access that power.

So a sun-powered Type-1 will be our first consideration. There is  another way we could become Type-1 that may yield even more energy, but I’ll come back to that. The average solar irradiance at the Earth is 1361 W/m^2, and our planet intercepts that  energy over a disk with the Earht’s radius, giving us an upper limit of 1.

7x10^17 Watts to  play with—let’s say 10^17 Watts. To put this into perspective, we currently use around 10^13 watts  globally—10,000 times shy of our Type I goal. Collecting anywhere close to 10^17 Watts in solar  power is going to take a lot more than covering the planet in modern solar panels—not that we’d  want to do that anyway.

The first program in upgrading our Kardeshev scale is improving our  solar collection capabilities. So let’s start by learning a bit more about solar cells. The most common solar cells are typically made from silicon and are an application of  semiconductor technology that we discussed here.

To summarize, you have two layers of silicon,  each mixed or doped with a different element. One of these doped elements grants an extra  free electron to its layer—this is a p-type senmiconductor and on its own those free electrons  allow the flow of current. The other layer doped element subtracts one electron, creating  an electron hole and an n-type semiconductor.

And those holes can also flow as a current.  Now if you splice those lakers together, the free electrons diffuse from p-type to  n-type—across the p-n junction—to fill the holes, at which point the system is non-conducting. But  if you provide energy to those electrons they jump back across the p-n junction and are able to flow  around any circuit that the device is attached to.

This is exactly how transistors work,  with the energy being provided by a small electric potential. In solar cells,  the energy is provided by incoming photons in a process called photoexcitation. In a  solar panel, a circuit provides a path for those electrons to return to the n-type layer  and their energy can be extracted en route.

But there’s a fundamental limit to how much  energy a solar cell can extract from light. This is called the Shockley-Queisser  limit. There are a few effects that go into determining this limit, but for now let’s  focus on one of the big ones: spectrum losses.

The energy required to move an electron  between layers is a very specific number: typically the energy of a near-infrared  photon. Photons with less energy, which means most infrared, do nothing  at all. Photons with more energy—all visible and ultraviolet light—will excite their  electron, but the excess energy gets lost as heat.

The photons in sunlight come with a very broad  range of energies, so some loss is inevitable, with an efficiency limit of around 50%. Other  effects drag the efficiency—Shockley–Queisser limit—down to around 30%. In practice we've only  just cracked 25% efficiency at the moment.

But this is for traditional solar cells with  a single p-n junction. Newer designs and materials offer the potential to exceed this  limit. For example, layered p-n junctions tuned to different energy photons can capture  a wider spectral range without wasting energy.

Certain special materials like perovskites have  a similar advantage. Quantum dots are another exciting possibility are quantum dots thanks to  their tunable absorption spectrum. In general, advances in materials science and nano-fabrication  are likely to boost us over 50% efficiency.

Even more important than conversion efficiency  is where we put these cells. Space-based solar power has a major energetic advantages.  Our atmosphere blocks most UV light, but in space those UV photons increase the  overall available energy for solar cells by a factor of 10.

Also there’s no night-time in space,  which adds another factor of two. And of course, it’s nice that we don’t have to cover Earth in  the things, leaving more room for the humans or our AI overlords to inhabit our Type I world. A major challenge with space-based solar is getting the energy back to Earth.

The most viable  candidate is microwave power transmission. 2. 45 GHz photons pass easily through our atmosphere. 

Pulses of these would be collected by receiver antennae – called rectennas — which would  convert those photons back to electricity. Or maybe we finally build that space elevator  to send people up and channel power down. So we’re really looking at swarms of solar arrays  orbiting Earth or in co-orbit around the Sun or at Earth’s Lagrange points.

With the James Webb  Space Telescope, we’ve demonstrated that we’re able to send large, fragile things into space. To  achieve our 10^17 Watt power source we’ll need an array quite a bit larger than the flattened disk  of the Earth in order to make up for the losses, which will never be zero. That’s more than a  hundred trillion square kilometers a lot of solar collectors, and if we scale down our silicon  solar cell thickness by a factor of 10 that’s still a few trillion kilograms, not including  supporting structure.

Fortunately silicon is the second most abundant element on Earth after  oxygen, so a few trillion kilograms is nothing. Add a bit of asteroid mining for the supporting  infrastructure, this feels distantly doable. And of course this will put our new Type I  civilization on track to Type II — just keep building arrays until we wreath the entire  Sun and we have an effective Dyson sphere.

Solar is the most obvious path to Type-I-dom,  but it may not be the best. Remember that the Sun generates energy through nuclear fusion—by  smashing together hydrogen nuclei to make helium, and converting a small fraction of the  mass into energy. So rather than being content to soak up the energy that  the Sun happens to radiate our way, why not build our own mini-Suns on Earth? 

Let’s talk about artificial fusion. In the Sun, particles are smashed  together and fused into new, heavier nuclei in a series of reactions known  as the proton-proton chain. It starts with lone protons—hydrogen nuclei—and ends in Helium-4  nuclei.

The most energy is obtained during a particular step of that chain, when two types  of heavy hydrogen—deuterium and tritium—smash together to form helium 4. About 0. 4 of  1% of the mass of the ingoing particles is converted into energy, mostly in the  kinetic energy of an ejected neutron.

That doesn’t sound very efficient, but remember,  E=mc2 describes the conversion of mass to energy, and the c2 does some heavy lifting here.  Deuterium-tritium fusion releases four times as much energy as Uranium fission gram for  gram. That means to reach our Type-I energy goal of 10^17 Watts we’d need to convert  a few hundred kilograms of heavy hydrogen into helium per second.

Fortunately we have a  massive supply of deuterium—I’ll come back to the tritium. Earth’s oceans contain around  1. 4 billion billion metric tons of water, one eighth of which is hydrogen by mass, and 0.

016  percent of that is hydrogen is deuterium. If we burned the oceans deuterium, we’d be able to power  our Type 1 civilization for a few million years before running out. And if we can’t make it to  Type 2 by then, well, maybe it wasn’t meant to be.

Having the fuel for fusion is one thing, but we  also have to have the reactors. How long before we have that? Commercial fusion is famously 50  years away no matter when you ask.

That said, there are major programs to bring this  to reality. The most promising approaches use powerful magnetic fields to  confine an extremely hot plasma, trying to duplicate the crushing effect of  the intense gravity in the core of the Sun. Perhaps the most famous is the International  Thermonuclear Experimental reactor—ITER—in France; a type of reactor called a Tokomak.

There are  other magnetic confinement projects and designs, and also non-magnetic and non-confinement options,  but that’s not for this video. Currently magnetic confinement seems most promising for commercial  reactors, and ITER is the furthest along. There are still many challenges to overcome  before magnetic confinement fusion is commercially viable—from dealing the the plasma  instabilities to safely extracting the energy from the extreme-energy neutrons produced in  fusion.

The main issue is getting more energy out that you put in to get the reaction started  and maintained. And that seems to be a matter of scale. Larger reactors should have an easier time  doing that—and this is the great hope of ITER, with its proposed 500 MegaWatt output  supposedly only needing 10% of that to sustain the reaction.

This is scheduled  to come online in around 10 years or 50. OK, back to the question. Assuming we get fusion  technology, how many reactors do we need to power our aspiring Type-I status?

Let’s say we build  many ITERs. We only expect a fraction of its output to be convertible to electricity—those  neutrons are hard to catch. At 20% efficiency we’d need 100,000 reactors to power our  super-civilization.

That is a lot, but it’s not … utterly preposterous. If we double efficiency and  scale reactor size by a factor of 10 then 5,000 reactors scattered across the globe will provide  every Watt we’ll need for millions of years. But with great power comes great need for  storage and distribution of that power.

That means the development of a planetary-scale  supergrid. Rather than stringing lossy copper cables across the planet, we’re going  to want to parallel-track development of high temperature superconducting cables.  Underground networks of, say, yttrium barium copper oxide can distribute our new extreme  current density with minimal power dissipation, thanks to their zero resistance  when they become superconducting.

Challenges here include the fact that even  high temperature superconductors need to be cooled quite a bit, which means both  energy and cumbersome piping. The energy part we seem to have sorted, and we’re going  to require those chunky pipes anyway due to the typical brittleness of superconductors. This  is stuff that companies are working on today, so we can hope it’s sorted by the time we need it.

OK, so we have a couple of paths to  Type-1-civilization-hood. But now that we have a completely ridiculous amount of energy,  what do we do with it? Why did we go to all this trouble anyway?

Honestly, maybe we didn’t  need to. Maybe we can settle down and live in modest harmony with our planet and  chill on these expansionist tendencies. Maybe it’s juvenile to obsess over some made  up metrics in a soviet paper from the 60s.

But seeing as we got this far, and we  have an imaginary Type-1 civilization, we may as well do something with it. Part of  being a Type I civilisation is the ability to not just harness the energy on Earth, but to  be in control of its natural forces. We now have access to energy on the same scale as the  atmosphere and the ocean, and so can, presumably, change them for the better.

So I guess we start  out by saving the planet, reverse climate change and all that, now that we actually plan  to stick around as a species for a while. They say if you have a hammer, every problem is  a nail. But energy is the most versatile hammer there is, and it’s the ultimate currency  of problem-solving.

Near limitless clean energy can enable colossal scales of resource  gathering and manufacturing—from mass-scale desalination and farming to asteroid mining,  advanced manufacturing, building perfect cities for all peoples. We could turn the Earth into a  paradise of abundance. Assuming we also solve all world conflicts, which energy can’t do directly  although surely eliminating scarcity helps.

Energy is information and power is computation.  Our supercomputers will run hot and grind out solutions to all technological challenges and  unlock the secrets of the universe with sheer brute force processing and unthinkably capable  AI. We’ll duplicate our energy facilities to power the terraforming of other worlds, creating  simulacra of our Earthly paradise.

And so humanity will claw its way towards the next levels of  Kardashev’s scale. Or we might just spend the energy mining Kardeshev-coin and training our  AI successors. But whether it’s us or them, Earth will be on track to spawning  a civilization of the Type II, soon mastering the energy of an entire  star, and then of many.

And then maybe we look back at Nicholai Kardeshev’s little paper  and realise that we are the beacons he imagined, and that we’ve announced our presence to new  Type-0s still emerging across galactic spacetime. Thank you to Anydesk for supporting PBS.  Scientists often find themselves in some of the most remote corners of the world.

And whether  you’re in a remote location or just working from home, the need for reliable, secure communication  and data transfer remains important. With Anydesk, file transfer functionality allows for  fast, secure, and direct file transfers, bypassing the cloud entirely. With coverage all  over the world Anydesk remains fast and reliable, with over 99% uptime.

And when you’re  working on that groundbreaking research, you don’t want any distractions. Thankfully  Anydesk features a clean user interface and a simple user experience as well as compatibility  across multiple computing and mobile platforms. So even if your astronomical data  set is still running on WindowsXP9, Anydesk still has you covered with  backwards compatibility.

Anydesk is available for personal use, but if your rese arch requires a lot of global coordination, Anydesk offers custom-tailored business  plans. To learn more about Anydesk, go to anydesk. com/spacetime or check  out the link in the description.

Hey, Everyone! You know how black holes pull  everything in with irresistible gravity? And you know how the upcoming holiday season often  feels the exact same way?

Well that’s why we’d like to welcome you to our first ever Black Hole  Friday Sale! On Friday, November 29th, for one day only the entire Merch store catalog will be on  sale for 20% off. We also have a bunch of brand new merch such as the first ever Multifunctional  Space Time Pen, which features a level, rulers in inches, centimeters, and millimeters, a stylus  and micro screwdriver.

It’s basically a low-grade sonic screwdriver yet. Stand by for the full-tech  version. If you need somewhere to use that pen, we have our first ever collection of Space Time  Pocket Logs which are perfect for capturing the equations for your theory of quantum gravity.

We  also have a new Standard Model LED night light for when you’re working on your theories late into the  evening, a new Neural Net desktop mat to keep your computer stylish while your run your simulations,  a 520 Piece Puzzle for when you’re waiting on those simulations to render, our first ever Poster  that will remind you of where all elements came from, and a Penrose Diagram Black Hole Rocks  Glass, for when you need a tasty beverage to celebrate of your successful theory. Can we  legally say buying Space Time merch will help you formulate a Nobel Prize winning physics theory?  That’s a grey area.

But we can offer you 20% off every t-shirt, hoodie, patch, pin we’ve sold this  year during their special re-appearance on the Merch store. We can also let you know about this  amazing Space Time Ugly Holiday Sweater, which you could theoretically wear to holiday events  or to accept any kind of important international prize. And speaking of the non-Americans, if  you're one of our many international viewers, November 29th will be that last date we can  guarantee international delivery before December 25th.

So if you need a gift for any special person  in the galaxy, including yourself, remember to go to PBSspacetime. com/shop on November 29th  for our 1st ever Black Hole Friday sale!