Jesus is an Alien and the Evidence is Everywhere

Jesus is considered the Son of God and the savior  of humanity. His story, as told in the Gospels, reveals that Mary became pregnant by the grace  of the Holy Spirit and that she, the Virgin Mary, would give birth to the Son of God. In the Gospels, Jesus says that whoever sees him sees the Father.

He says that he  is in the Father, and the Father is in him. However, when we explore the Anunnaki subject, we  are introduced to a different story. Naturally, we are left feeling confused… Who is Jesus,  who is God, and who are the Anunnaki?

The time has come… It’s time  for the truth… to be revealed! … Mary, a young virgin from Nazareth, was pledged to  be married to Joseph, a descendant of King David. Before they came together, she was found to  be with child through the Holy Spirit.

Joseph, her betrothed, was a righteous man and did  not want to expose her to public disgrace. He planned to divorce her quietly, but as he  considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. The angel said, "Joseph, son of  David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for what is conceived in her is from the  Holy Spirit.

She will give birth to a son, and you are to give Him the name Jesus, because He  will save His people from their sins. " When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord  had commanded him and took Mary as his wife. In those days, Caesar Augustus issued a  decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world.

This required everyone to  return to their ancestral towns to be registered. Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in  Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem, the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of  David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was  expecting a child.

While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and Mary  gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped Him in swaddling clothes and laid Him in a manger,  because there was no room for them in the inn. Nearby, shepherds were living out in the  fields, keeping watch over their flocks at night.

Suddenly, an angel of the Lord appeared to  them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel  said to them, "Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for  all the people.

Today in the city of David, a Savior has been born to you; He is Christ  the Lord. This will be a sign to you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling  cloths and lying in a manger. " Suddenly, a great company of the heavenly host appeared  with the angel, praising God and saying, "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth  peace to those on whom His favor rests.

" When the angels had left them and gone into  heaven, the shepherds said to one another, "Let us go to Bethlehem and see this thing that  has happened, which the Lord has told us about. " So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and  the baby, who was lying in the manger. When they had seen Him, they spread the word concerning  what had been told them about this child, and all who heard it were amazed at what  the shepherds said to them.

Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her  heart. The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard  and seen, which were just as they had been told. After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, wise  men from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, "Where is the one who has been born King of the  Jews?

We saw His star when it rose and have come to worship Him. " When King Herod heard this, he  was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. He called together the chief priests and teachers of  the law and asked them where the Messiah was to be born.

"In Bethlehem in Judea," they replied,  "for this is what the prophet has written. " The wise men went on their way, and the star they  had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When  they saw the star, they were overjoyed.

On coming to the house, they saw the child with His mother  Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped Him. They opened their treasures and presented Him  with gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. The narrative of the birth of Jesus is full of  different stories that may trigger in people the image of divine intervention and a divine  plan.

Jesus' lineage can be traced back to Adam, according to the Gospel of Luke, making Him part  of the divine plan from the very inception of humanity. This is why Jesus is often referred to  as the "Second Adam," a symbolic representation of a new beginning, one that would redeem  the episode called the fall of man caused by the original Adam. While the first Adam  brought sin and death into the world, Jesus, the Second Adam, came to restore  eternal life and offer salvation.

This interpretation of divine revelation and  salvation through Jesus completely disregards the findings of the 19th-century Mesopotamian  tablets. When considering these discoveries, a past emerges that precedes Jesus and differs  slightly from what is reported in the Bible. It is known that the texts in the Bible and the  Torah were written after the Mesopotamian tablets.

Although there is no clear episode regarding the  fall of man in these tablets, we do find accounts of the creation of humanity from the clay of the  earth and the divine breath of the Anunnaki gods, as well as the myth of Adapa and Adapa's journey. The Mesopotamian tablets do not explicitly use the term "genetic engineering," but  it is implied in their narrative, as seen in the texts of Enki and Ninmah, the Epic  of Atrahasis, and even the Epic of Gilgamesh, where it becomes evident that the gods, when  creating humanity, destined them for death, reserving eternal life solely for the gods. Thus, the idea that Jesus is the "Second Adam" can be seen not metaphorically, but realistically,  extremely realistically.

Jesus is clearly and explicitly a hybrid. The texts leave no shadow  of doubt in this regard. According to the Gospels, the Holy Spirit came upon Mary, and the "power of  the Most High" overshadowed her.

This event led to a miraculous conception, often seen as divine  in nature. But what if this "overshadowing" was an advanced form of genetic manipulation or  artificial insemination carried out by the Anunnaki? The term "Most High" is a translation  of the Greek term in the New Testament, which refers to "El Elyon" in Hebrew.

"El  Elyon" can be translated as a very high in terms of hierarchical superiority and not exactly  in a spiritual sense. In this context, "El Elyon" is a title for the commander of the Elohim. As discussed in other videos, the Anunnaki and the Elohim are one and the same.

The  Anunnaki are involved in the episode of the creation of humanity, which in the Bible  is attributed to the Elohim, a majestic plural for God according to Hebrew tradition, but in  reality, this is a plural term. The Anunnaki are also involved in the episode of the deluge,  just like the Elohim in the Bible. And it is worth remembering that Yahweh declares that He is  one of the Elohim, the Elohim of the Israelites, as stated in the Book of Deuteronomy.

In this sense, there is absolutely no way to remain unaffected by this story. It is impossible  not to compare the story of the Anunnaki and the Elohim with Jesus. It is inevitable to face  this situation.

And yes, obviously, Jesus is an extraterrestrial; Jesus is an Anunnaki. His  father belongs to the stars, to the heavens, and not to Earth. If in the Sumerian tablets we  read that the Anunnaki created humanity by mixing the blood of the gods with the clay of the earth,  and from this created Adam, originating from an Anunnaki womb, from Mami, the mother goddess,  also known as Belet-Ili, Ninhursag, or Ninmah, then Jesus is the mixture of the seed of the  gods with the gestation of an earthly woman.

. . From now on, it is a path with no return,  as things will become more and more complex.

Those who have been following this channel know. . . 

my aim here is to share knowledge and provoke your thinking so that you think independently of any  pre-established conception or institutionalized religion. My goal is not to convince you of  my point of view. Furthermore, the videos are well-researched and offer different perspectives  on the topics discussed here.

Therefore, if you feel curious about these subjects,  I invite you to subscribe to the channel. Established religions are not based on logic and  thought but on faith. Most religions position themselves as religions of revelation, where  what is revealed is the truth, and from that point onward, we must not question it, or we may  be punished.

However, when fear of questioning is removed, a new world and a new universe unfold.  The Mesopotamian tablets represent a new paradigm. There are various scientific studies and books  on this topic, ranging from scholars dedicated to scientific analysis to those who connect  different perspectives, mythologies, studies, and archaeological findings with metaphysics,  mythology, and religious texts—something that scholars aligned with science would never do.

However, when observing the story of Jesus through the Anunnaki perspective, a  new reality becomes evident. Could it be that Jesus’s birth was  part of a grander Anunnaki agenda? The so-called "angelic" visitations to Mary and  Joseph could be reinterpreted as interactions with extraterrestrial beings, perhaps even  members of the Anunnaki hierarchy.

Even though we are referring to the New Testament,  many words translated from the original Greek to English reference the original Hebrew term.  This is the case with the term "angel," which is translated from the Hebrew word malach,  and the plural malachim. The meaning of these words is simply "messenger.

" The malachim  or the angels are messengers of the Elohim, or messengers of the gods. In the Gospel  of Luke, Gabriel states that he is the one standing "in sight of God," or "in sight of  theou" in that text. “Theou” is not exactly a word that could be translated as "God" with a  capital G.

“Theou” derives from “theos”, which, in turn, means "god" without a capital letter. In ancient Greek religion, “theos” referred to deities worshiped in various cities, each with  different attributes. Thus, when referring to this term, it is essentially referring  to all the gods.

For Plato and Aristotle, this term had other meanings, but we will  not delve into them now. What is essential to understand is that when Gabriel appears to Mary,  he is not exactly a divine being but a messenger speaking on behalf of an established group of  gods, represented by the term “theos” or “theou”. In the texts, Jesus is also a direct descendant  of King David, fulfilling the Old Testament prophecies that the Messiah would emerge  from David's line.

This lineage establishes Jesus’s legal right to the throne of Israel,  emphasizing His royal heritage and messianic role. Furthermore, His ancestry connects Him  to Abraham, the father of the Israelite nation, symbolizing the covenant made by the so-called  God in the Bible with Abraham—a promise that through his seed, all nations would be blessed. This opens the possibility that Jesus’s lineage was not just spiritually significant but  genetically meaningful to those who had been overseeing humanity’s development for millennia.

In this context, the name of Jesus may reveal important clues for trying to unravel His  story. First, it must be clarified that the letter “J” only appeared in the 14th century,  meaning that the original name of “Jesus” is not “Jesus”. In the versions presenting a literal  translation that I usually study, the name “Jesus” appears as Iesous in Greek.

This name, in turn,  originates from the Hebrew and Aramaic “Yeshua”, which, in turn, originates from “Yehoshua”. The first time the name 'Jesus' appears with the letter “J“ is in 1629. Some scholars suggest that  the intention of introducing the letter “J” to the name 'Ihesu', as it was called at that time, was  to attract pagans who worshiped other gods like Zeus and Jupiter, as well as Celtic traditions  where the name 'Esus' appears.

Some scholars argue that the original name attributed to 'Jesus  Christ' was 'Zesus Cristus,' connecting it to Zeus and Jupiter. Billy Carson, in various interviews,  states that Jesus derives from the term 'Hail Zeus. ' Although I watch some of his content  and we share similar content with people here, I must admit that while there is indeed a strong  possibility, I have not been able to find any practical evidence to support this claim.

I even  wonder if it would be easy to find such evidence… When Jesus is related to Zeus, there is a strong  connection to the clan of Enlil. From this point, we can embark on one of the long  journeys to unravel these secrets. Enlil is the son of the Almighty Anu, the father  of the Anunnaki.

According to Zecharia Sitchin's theories, Enlil is the "lord of command,"  the one who receives command over Earth, while his brother Enki is considered the "lord  of the waters. " Enlil, in turn, is associated with the first region, which includes the  present-day area of Israel. Enlil is the god of winds and lightning and has a direct connection  with who Zeus is for the Greeks.

However, his father, Anu, is also directly related  to Zeus in Greek mythology. Perhaps, whoever sees the son Enlil also sees the father,  Anu. Anu is identified by many scholars as Zeus to the Greeks and Jupiter to the Romans. 

Jupiter, in turn, was also called Jove, a name that originates from “Iove” and could be  the Latinized form referring to Yahweh. This name, Jove, and Zeus are directly connected to the Hindu  deity Dyaus-Pita, meaning "god-father," which is related to the names Zeus-Pita or Zeus-Pater,  or Zeus-Father. This same name is linked to the name Akasha, which in Hinduism represents  space or ether, a term derived from "sky," but also meaning "heaven.

" In this way, Jesus  appears to clearly belong to the clan of Enlil. However, how can Jesus be conceived  as having any relation to Enlil, who, according to the Mesopotamian tablets, sent  the flood to destroy humanity? Wasn't it Enki who decided to save humans?

Even the Jews, many of them, did not consider Jesus to be the Messiah. However, despite Jesus’ clear fulfillment of the prophecies and His lineage that  aligned with messianic expectations, not all Israelites accepted Him as their Messiah.  This rejection was rooted in a mix of religious, social, and political factors that deeply  influenced the perception of Jesus' identity and mission among the Jewish people of His time.

From a religious standpoint, one major reason for the rejection of Jesus as the Messiah was related  to His teachings and claims, which some religious leaders viewed as blasphemous. For many, Jesus’  declaration of being the "Son of God" and statements such as "before Abraham was, I am" were  not just challenging but outright blasphemous, as they implied equality with God. This was a  direct violation of Jewish monotheism, where God was understood as a singular, transcendent  being.

In the eyes of the Pharisees and Sadducees, such claims could not be reconciled with their  understanding of the law and the prophets, leading to a strong reaction against Him. Moreover, Jesus often criticized the religious establishment, calling out the Pharisees and  scribes for their hypocrisy, legalism, and failure to understand the true spirit of the Law.  This put Him in direct conflict with the religious authorities, who felt that He was undermining  the established traditions and teachings that governed Jewish life.

His reinterpretation of the  Law, such as healing on the Sabbath or associating with sinners and tax collectors, was seen as  a threat to the purity and sanctity of the religious order. The religious leaders accused  Him of violating God’s Law, making Him a figure of controversy and division among the Israelites. On the political front, Jesus was also perceived as a potential threat to the stability of the  Roman-occupied region.

The Israelites of that era were living under Roman rule, which was enforced  with strict control to maintain order and suppress any form of rebellion. Many Jews expected  the Messiah to be a political deliverer, a warrior-king like David who would liberate Israel  from foreign rule and reestablish a sovereign kingdom. Jesus, however, did not advocate  for a military revolt against Rome; instead, He spoke of a kingdom "not of this world.

" In this sense, Jesus speaks of a different kind of God and a different kind of kingdom. Jesus often speaks of a spiritual world and another life, seeming to allude to a different  kind of god, one that does not resemble Yahweh. In the Old Testament, God is depicted in a variety  of ways, ranging from a creator to a judge, a lawgiver, and a warrior.

In some narratives, His  actions include severe judgments, such as plagues, floods, and wars, where entire nations or groups  of people are destroyed. These actions are often presented as divine responses to sin, idolatry,  and rebellion against His covenant with Israel. One of the most striking examples is the conquest  of Canaan, where God commands the Israelites to conquer and, in some instances, completely  annihilate certain Canaanite populations.

This is often justified in the text as a way to purify  the land from idolatry and moral corruption. The Old Testament also recounts instances like the  plagues of Egypt, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and punishments like the execution  of transgressors under the Mosaic Law. In these accounts, God is often presented as exercising  strict justice and demanding obedience to His laws and commandments, sometimes through harsh means.

In contrast, Jesus’ depiction of God in the New Testament emphasizes attributes  like mercy, compassion, forgiveness, and love. Jesus describes God as a loving Father  who cares for the righteous and the wicked alike, sending rain and sunshine on both. His  parables often portray God as a patient and forgiving figure, as seen in the Parable of the  Prodigal Son, where God is depicted as a father who eagerly welcomes back a wayward child.

Jesus  also speaks of God’s desire for reconciliation, highlighting forgiveness over retribution, as in  His instruction to forgive "seventy times seven times," reflecting a limitless capacity for mercy. Jesus’ central commandment to "love your neighbor as yourself" and even to "love your enemies"  marks a distinct approach compared to the more severe aspects of divine justice in the Old  Testament. His Sermon on the Mount reinforces this, with teachings that stress turning  the other cheek, walking the extra mile, and giving without expecting in return.

Jesus  emphasizes that God values the heart’s intention, promoting internal transformation rather  than mere adherence to legalistic rules. In this sense, if we compare the Mesopotamian  tablets, we find Jesus aligned with principles of peace, love, salvation, and protection, which  resonate more with the actions of Enki than with those of Enlil. Enlil attempted to destroy  humanity during the episode of the flood, while Enki saved humanity by choosing Atrahasis in  some texts, or Utnapishtim or Ziusudra in others.

Thus, Enki seems much more aligned with  the Jesus we know from the Gospels, as well as the descriptions and attributes  of God that Jesus offers. In this context, if "whoever sees Jesus sees the Father,"  then who would the Father be? In traditional Mesopotamian mythology, Enki's father is  Anu.

This suggests a similar path that appears to lead to Anu's name. As previously  discussed, Anu is associated with Jupiter, Zeus, and Dyaus-Pita. Anu is the father  of the Anunnaki, symbolized by the simple star and the Maltese cross—the same symbol  adopted by the Knights Templar.

However, there is also the possibility that the Father is  not Anu, but Enki himself, making Jesus his son. Enki created the seven sages of Babylonian  mythology, who brought the necessary knowledge to establish civilization, among whom we can  recall the apkallu. These are the apkallu or Oannes, mythological creatures that  are part human, part animal—sometimes depicted as fish, sometimes as birds.

Additionally, Adapa, a priest from the city of Eridu, was regarded as Enki's son. Adapa  might have even known the "kingdom of heaven" when he visited Anu in the celestial vault. The mystery here is vast and profound.

It feels as if we are touching the invisible  and the hidden, approaching secret knowledge. I like to imagine, just as a thought experiment,  that Jesus is an avatar—a body genetically created and developed to receive a consciousness, a  spirit, a soul, an anima meant to bring light to the world. Perhaps this being is Enki himself. 

Perhaps Enki is there, directing this avatar, commanding this body, in a true kingdom. And  perhaps "whoever sees Jesus, sees the same father, Enki. " After all, he opposed Enlil's ideas.

However, it’s important to recognize that Jesus did not completely discard the God of the  Old Testament. He affirmed the authority of the Hebrew Scriptures, referring to them frequently  and stating that He came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets, not to abolish them. Jesus’  teachings about God’s judgment, particularly in parables like the wheat and the tares or the sheep  and the goats, echo the idea of divine justice seen in the Old Testament, where there is a clear  separation between the righteous and the wicked.

Thus, it must be said that my thought  about Jesus being an avatar of Enki is just a way of thinking, and it is far  from a conclusion. But it is a possibility! Those with a more traditional Christian  faith have probably abandoned the video by now.

Many might say that I am  crazy. But it’s essential to remember that the father of Jesus remains a mystery. If we consider the possibility that Jesus’s "Father" was an Anunnaki entity, He might not  only be seen as a theological anomaly but also as a being who could have been considered  a representative of these ancient "gods," challenging the established religious order.

Interestingly, if Jesus had Anunnaki origins, His behavior might reflect a mission that  transcended human laws and traditions. The Anunnaki possessed advanced knowledge and  a different moral framework, potentially explaining why Jesus’s teachings seemed radical  and unprecedented. His emphasis on forgiveness, compassion, and prioritizing the spirit over the  letter of the Law might align with a broader, more cosmic perspective—one that could have been  rooted in Anunnaki philosophy or directives.

This line of thought gains special attention  when considering the Atlantean civilizations and the pursuit of a spiritual path. Various  enlightened beings have traversed this planet, bringing messages of peace, love,  understanding, and spiritual redemption. I am drawn to spiritual practices like meditation,  and for a long time, I have pondered over Hindu mythology and its teachings and spiritual  practices, such as mantras.

Many years ago, I entered an Indian temple in my city in Brazil,  where an adept, seated in a lotus position, spoke to me about Krishna and His teachings. At  that time, I was not familiar with the Anunnaki subject. However, I had already practiced Yoga  and enjoyed closing my eyes, taking deep breaths while listening to Tibetan singing bowls,  and engaging in certain breathing techniques, the pranayamas.

Could the gods of the past  have left us hidden, precious teachings? Years later, after discovering this fascinating  topic and delving into numerous works, I began to observe my dreams and meditations more  closely, pushing my questions even further. For a long time, I wondered: could Krishna be an  Anunnaki?

Krishna is an avatar of Vishnu, who is known as "The Preserver" within the  Trimurti—the triple deity of the supreme divinity that includes Brahma and Shiva. In Vaishnavism,  Vishnu is the supreme Lord who creates, protects, and transforms the universe. This could imply  the movements of creation and destruction of the universe, the perfect marriage of the cosmic  dance of order and chaos, harmony and disharmony, life and death.

Could Anu, Enki, and Enlil be  present here as well? If Krishna is an avatar, could Jesus not be one too? What explains His resurrection?

That is, if a resurrection actually occurred. Some suggest  that Jesus did not die and reappeared in Kashmir as a healer, or perhaps had a different  fate. I recall Osho speaking about this.

What intrigues me the most is  what Jesus said about His kingdom. The idea of a "kingdom not of this world"  could be reinterpreted in light of Anunnaki influence. If Jesus was an emissary of the  Anunnaki, His references to a different kind of kingdom might not have been solely spiritual. 

It could have been a subtle acknowledgment of a connection to the Anunnaki’s own celestial  realm or even their home planet, Nibiru, according to Sitchin’s interpretation. Could  Jesus’s mission have been intended to prepare humanity for eventual Anunnaki guidance or  influence, aiming to shift humanity’s focus from earthly power struggles to cosmic awareness? Despite this spiritual focus, Jesus’ growing popularity among the common people and His  messianic claims could not be separated from their political implications.

The Roman authorities,  along with the Jewish Sanhedrin, saw Him as a potential agitator capable of inciting unrest  among the masses. His triumphant entry into Jerusalem, where crowds hailed Him as the "King  of Israel," alarmed both the Jewish leaders and Roman officials, as it carried the overtones of  a royal claim—something that could destabilize the already fragile political situation. The Roman governor Pontius Pilate was also aware of these political tensions  when Jesus was brought before him.

The accusations against Jesus included claims of  being the "King of the Jews," a title with direct implications for Roman authority. While Pilate  found no basis for a charge of insurrection, he recognized the political danger of allowing  Jesus to continue His ministry unchecked, especially given the insistence of the Jewish  leaders and the potential for public unrest. If we consider the possibility of Anunnaki  involvement, Pilate’s decision to sentence Jesus to death could be seen not just as a political  move but potentially as part of a broader, interdimensional conflict.

Could Jesus’s  execution have been intended to suppress knowledge or power that the Anunnaki—or  at least some factions among them—wanted to keep hidden? Was His crucifixion a result  of both earthly politics and cosmic agendas, intersecting at this critical moment in history? More deeply than this, it is necessary to  examine the darker aspects of all of this.

. . There is an ancient myth called Inanna's  Descent to the Netherworld.

What we can see from this myth is something dark and dangerous!  Examining it reveals profound meanings that have been hidden from us for millennia. Known  as the goddess of love but also of war, Inanna is called Ishtar in Babylonian culture  and later Venus by the Romans.

Astronomically, Venus is the morning star, illuminating the night  sky just before dawn. When the morning star sets, the sun rises, heralding a new day. In the myth The Descent of Inanna to the Underworld, Inanna, the morning  star, dies, is hung on a stake, and resurrects after three days.

For her  resurrection, Inanna sacrifices her lover, the shepherd Dumuzi. There are many parallels  between Dumuzi and Jesus, and between Inanna and Lucifer, as Inanna is the morning star, and  Jesus is a solar figure associated with the Logos, fulfilling the Roman figure Natalis Solis Invicti.  This was the date on which the god Mithras, the Persian solar deity associated with  Ahura Mazda, was celebrated.

Ahura Mazda, possibly linked to Utu-Shamash of ancient Babylon,  opposed Angra Mainyu, the god of darkness. To learn more about these deities, I invite you  to explore the playlist The Aliens That Rule the Earth. In our next video, we’ll delve into the  myth of Inanna's Descent to the Netherworld, where we can weave together material,  manipulation, and spiritual aspects to approach the realm of the shepherd who is not of  this world.

When the morning star sets at dawn, the sun rises. When Inanna descends to  the underworld, the shepherd resurrects. Between manipulation, speculation, and truth, two  certainties remain: the stories of Jesus and the Anunnaki are inseparable, and the message of Jesus  is more significant than the possibly manipulated history that has been handed down to us.

In the myth of Inanna—and in its various versions—it is a woman who resurrects  after three days, hung upon a stake. Beyond faith and belief, this is the first  mythological account of a deity’s descent into the underworld or hell and the first  mythological account of a resurrection. We cannot argue with history.

. . We cannot fight  against history!

We cannot change history! Some claim that Inanna-Ishtar was revered not  only as Venus but also as Esther, Astarte, Ashtoreth, and Ostara, the Germanic goddess for  whom eggs are painted during the Easter season. For me, discovering this was very  shocking as well.

And the deeper we go into the history of Inanna and Dumuzi,  the Shepherd, the more parallels we see. We’ll explore this further at another time. This will not be the only video about Jesus on the channel.

It’s the first and will be at  the top of a playlist dedicated to the topic of Jesus and the Anunnaki. I believe  this subject is complex and extremely interesting. Additionally, it’s crucial to  bring these topics to a broader audience.

So, subscribe to the channel to make sure  you don’t miss the upcoming videos. This video is quite complex and was  challenging to produce. Please leave a comment, sharing your thoughts respectfully.

I invite you to choose your next video from the options on the screen. See you in the next video.