Is Bureaucracy Killing Civilization?

there was an intellectual breakthrough That was supposed to happen but didn't I say this since I've read most of the authors in the science of History what I've consistently found is that most of said authors were writing Around the World War era authors like Oswald Spangler amori duror Carol Quigley koneski William mcneel Arnold Toby amongst others I don't think we as a society understand how intelligent these people were on top of this when you read older books it's immediately obvious that our society has lost intellectual advancement we're so addicted to the idea of progress that

we can't stomach the idea that we're less intelligent than our ancestors these thinkers are operating on a level of analysis which you would never see today for example Spangler looked at how society's concepts of nature math and time can predict its civilizational point in its life cycle and also what the destiny of said civilization is these authors ended up getting a lot right Spangler Ralph Linton Amal during aor and Carol Quigley all predicted writing about a century ago that the story of the 21st century would be atheism caesarism social alienation and population collapse Quigley predicted

the fall of the Soviet Union and Amore the stagnation of the Sciences with all that being said these authors all end up sharing a few different points for one they all agree that the collapse in religion was a civilization destroying Calamity although all authors agree on this point Carol quickly writing around 1960 especially said that the West's lack of a strong religion if not solved immediately would turn into a cancer that would consume every single part of western civilization he titled his history of the 20th century tragedy and hope given he hoped the tragedy of

the world wars would provoke self inspection in western civilization to create the hope of a new religious breakthrough that could save the West in the 21st century we've since seen with the rise of a suicidal anti-church to Total dominance in the west that he was correct the one thing that all these authors agreed on something which they all made the greatest effort to convey as basically their most important point is that something unexpected would be the greatest threat to Western civilization all these authors writing Around the World War era agreed that the rise of the

bureaucracy was the most dangerous thing to Western civilization that if left untrammeled that it would destroy every that made the west and Global civilization great molding us into a broken tyranny turning us into everything we hated why did they think that and more horrifyingly why is it's already [Music] happened a huge reason we're facing this crisis is due to the feminization of of society which is reached into every single aspect of life the masculine is what pushes against bureaucratization and without the masculine bureaucracy takes over everything it's why I'm always looking for ways to revitalize

masculinity however there is hope and black forest is a good place to start Black Forest nmn supplements have been dubbed the feminization killer nmn is Nico nide mono nucleotide a derivative of the B vitamin nasin which works by replenishing diminished NAD plus levels which naturally fall at a rate of around 1% a year nmn is known to dramatically improve Health and Longevity by serving as a precursor to nad+ a compound that plays a crucial role in energy production muscle regener gener ation metabolism and gene expression in the body I actually do use black forest in

my daily life and there's stuff is really useful especially when I need to get stuff done and since they sponsored this video we have an exclusive offer for you if you can go to our Link in the description or pinned comment then for the next 48 hours you can buy two and get one for free so stock up now when you still can in times like this we need to be vigilant prepared and most importantly we need to take control of our health because if we don't they will so arm yourself with knowledge stock up

on nmn and let's show them that we won't be silenced or subdued we're in this together and together we'll rise above part one class analysis I think we exist in a beautiful moment for dissidence now given the establishment has failed on almost every level of what a functioning Society should expect this means that for enterprising folks watching you can choose to provide a service and make good money doing so Academia has become ideological propaganda so start writing yourself the traditional movie industry has failed so start making your own movies this is a great point to

start with since it illustrates multiple points I'm trying to convey one of the things I would like to co-opt from the left is class analysis this is since the left basically invented class analysis and then used it as a vector to win a huge reason the left dominate society today is that they were able to use three different intellectual tricks to manipulate the populace without them even knowing the left had an intellectual breakthrough in the century from 1850 to 1950 which gave them incredible power those three thinkers or at least the ones I can think

of now in that I'm probably missing some more are Marx Hegel and Freud read this text wall if you're interested Marx was able to study class analysis and thus was able to differentiate the population into different subter interest groups with innate different self-interests what the left was able to do was to Ally itself with certain groups in our era women and ethnic or sexual minorities from this they were able to paner to their self-interests in order to divide Society to win is why their platform is their controlled version of diversity since they've shoved those groups

into their Coalition and thus by putting those groups in positions of power for diversity they can hold on to power very effectively however as we'll see in this video if anyone studied class oppression today they would see that the left is doing class oppression to a horrifying level almost everything the left does today is an attempt by the bureaucracy to gain complete authority over Society anyone who would study class analysis to the slightest degree would end up finding this even leftwing authors like David Graber I would like the right to co-opt class analysis for our

own benefit I would like the right to take every single leftist technique except those that would make us lose our souls in order to make ourselves better and sharper for years I've wanted to make a video studying how different social classes affect the societies they're in I haven't passed the threshold of intuitive comprehension where I feel comfortable in my own ability to write that video yet though however the best way to explain it is that there are a series of social classes that different Societies in history can choose to lead them said dominant social class

will rework every single element of society in its favor including its social structure ruling ideology or religion economics social cues literature and anything else you could think of in effect it permeates the society on such a profound level as to become inextricably linked into its social fabric Aristotle was able to make a really accurate model of political philosophy nearly 2500 years ago which you can read more about in this text wall since due to the structure of human society there are only so many ways you can Orient a society in Game Theory terms for Aristotle

it was either monarchy or rule by one man oligarchy or ruled by a cabal of men and democracy or all men a society can be governed by the priest class the warrior nobility the merchants and worst of all the secret police just to say a few of the social classes that I've consistently seen lead societies each of these is archetypal in that by choosing a certain ruling class the society takes in Ates with similarities to other often very different societies with the same ruling class Gano Musa talks a lot about this for those who are

interested a warrior Society will have honor as its most important value will often solve legal disputes through right of combat or will rule through divine right and have a family-based leadership a merchant L Society will naturally gravitate towards a parliamentary democracy with strong property rights in a colonial Empire a society run by the secret police will almost always be atheist or agnostic since religion acts as a break on the totalitarian extractive power of the secret police and instead we'll possibly have a utopian ideology which warrants Limitless growth in order to bring about Limitless good which

is the only thing that can justify said totalitarianism often times Elites are shared on a civilizational basis China has for thousands of years been run by the bureaucracy a parallel which we'll study later in this video it alludes to the current West meanwhile Egypt and India have been run by the priest class an interesting example for how a society can be molded by a certain ruling class is that when the Portuguese arrived in South India in the early 16th century there were low cast Kings who weren't allowed to make eye contact with high cast brahin

who were the subjects of their own country because the priest class had gained such a social predominance inside India that they weren't subservient even to their own rulers Greece and India were run by Warrior slave nobilities you often see ruling coalitions with probably the most normal Coalition being between a warrior nobility and a church as seen in most third world Societies or in the Islamic world the West Was the most successful Society in history since it had a balance of powers between different ruling classes whether the nobility monarchy Merchants church or other interests secondly of

all the things that made the West great the most important in my opinion was competition the Western tradition is predicated upon an objective aim to reach namely God or the truth and there's competition for who can best provide that service this is how science capitalism democracy the Western military system and Catholicism or even more so protestantism Works in that you establish a structure for domesticated competition in which the best result wins the West was able to dominate the world in almost every field whether science intellectual Health industry religion or War since the West is comfortable

with enough chaos that it's willing to enter into the Undiscovered or uncertain to return with Goods in glory basically every other Society views chaos as a pure evil and is obsessed with order this is why Asian societies venerate tradition the government and patriarchal Authority so much it's also why these societies fossilized and once the Europeans arrived with rifles and steamships they were unable to adapt a healthy Society is like water and that it can flow around and adapt to any situation it faces an example of this working really well and in my opinion the greatest

reason America and Rome became the most successful Societies in history was that their Founders established a division of powers which in turn established the seamless transfers from old corrupt Elites to new more vigorous ones in America we've seen the change of the dominant Elites going from East Coast Merchants to Southern plantation owners to Northern industrialists to Coastal managerial class and now we're forming a new Elite around the Gulf of Mexico based off the internet in Rome the elite changed from the at truscan Kings to the Roman nobility to the populist bosses the Roman Emperor the

Balan Warlords then Germanic barbarians or the Eastern Roman Empire in each case a successful Society is capable of changing out Elites once they become morally corrupt as all Elites naturally do over time as a biological Prin principle when a civilization goes into decline it's almost always predominantly driven by a single Elite taking over power this Elite then centralizes power and then shuts down progress or growth since any change would threaten their power this is why capitalism is so rare over history since the elite forms an alliance with the mob to tear down the vigorous and

successful since they excite the mob's envy and are a threat to the ruling class when you study when societies go into decline you find that it's often a point that's difficult to directly disentangle and it's an incredibly anticlimactic process if you want to look at Spain's decline you would find that there's no single year where Spain stopped being a great power and this is true of all countries like this whether Britain or the Muslim world or China where there is this anticlimactic moment where they shut themselves off to basically the Divine creativity that allowed them

to form great States and they become purely mechanical through trying to to maintain their current power which destroys their old creativity and then in the process of this event that no one noticed happened these societies lose everything which made them great in the beginning the ancient Greeks and Romans had Advanced Machinery in the steam engine but they never industrialized given slave labor was so cheap there was no push for productivity using Machinery was seen as ungentlemanly in effect a slave owning ruling class avoided any breakthroughs they could weaken their control over human money musle power

China in the 11th century started an industrial revolution with the largest blast furnaces ever seen until 19th century industrial Britain in the 15th century China sailed as far as Kenya and possibly America in the first case the ruling bureaucracy created so many regulations that the factories weren't profitable and in the second case the bureaucracy burned the treasure fleets after the jungal Emperor died Islam a thousand years ago was the wealthiest most technologically and philosophic Aly Advanced capitalist Humane feminist and politically strongest Society in the world however from that point the nobility and church teamed up

to keep down the merchant classes peasants and science the Middle East went through an active process of social Decay and decom mercial isation even before European colonialism the Middle East regulated itself Into Obscurity for just an example at the time of the Crusades the Levant was one of the wealthiest places in the world then descending into complete depopulation by the time the British conquered the region in the early 20th century Egypt in the 19th century had less than half the people it did in the 12th all of the authors I mentioned above knew about this

historic precedent this is why they were so terrified about the rise of the bureaucracy they knew this principle and before their own very eyes they saw the rise of the exact sort of social Elite which had killed every previous Civilization now why did the West go from the society which had done the best job ever at avoiding this to doing it to itself part two the story of Britain in 1914 Britain had the largest empire ever seen in global history even today the insane thing is that the largest Empire in history made up less than

5% of Britain's total GDP the British Empire also made up less than 15% of Britain's foreign trade this means that Britain conquered the world without ever having to even take up a fraction of their financial efforts pre-industrial taxes with some exceptions were so low as to barely register today Britain was the country in Europe with the highest tax rates and to survived the horrible Napoleonic Wars they raised their top income tax for the highest income brackets to 10% tops tax rate in Britain today is 50% in peace time every single incredible building you see in

Washington DC as well as the conquest of modern America from the natives was done by a society without an income income tax let's Zoom ahead to 1945 or within a single generation of this the government jumped from making up 5% of Britain's economy to something like 2/3 today governments in the Western World make up between half to 2/3 of the economy in peace time top income tax in Britain was 95% and 90% in America in very short time the government went from a relatively weak force in Britain and the rest of the Western World to

a complete dominating Sun the governments that came out of the world wars especially even more so behind the Iron Curtain were the most powerful and intrusive upon personal life known in human history a theme which will tease out in this video is that both sides of the Iron Curtain had much more in common than we'd like to give them credit for they were both sides of the same coin being atheist bureaucratic leftist technocracies it's clear that at some point in this process there was a major shift between different ruling classes this this is the sort

of thing that's normal historically in that the Black Death saw European civilization gradually transfer from a socioeconomic system based off feudal nobility to a merchant based capitalism alternately the Persian conquest of the near East in the 6th Century BC was a warrior Nomad Elite conquering native regimes like the Babylonians and Egyptians who were ruled by Theocratic priest classes Britain is an easy example of this Britain before World War I was a hybrid regime between a warrior nobility which threw a parliamentary system based off income where they worked with the industrial Merchant class who gradually gained

more power as time went on for a brief side note an alliance of the nobility and Merchants is one of the best combinations a society can have if done well with some of the most successful Societies in history having this combination for reasons I can explain in this text wall when we look at Britain in 1914 as said before with Global standing Empire that made up less than 5% of Britain's total GDP Britain was dependent off a gold standard they saw inflation as a moral evil in British law the government was not allowed to interfere

in private family life Britain did not have conscription until the final year of World War I relying off high social trust pushing recruitment since they saw a draft as state overreach the negative side of all of this was the British government was so low government that they didn't intervene in trying to improve the horrible famines in Ireland which lowered the Island's population by 2/3 in the middle of the 19th century as well as in India which saw 30 million deaths over the British colonial period making the famines in British India one of the bloodiest atrocities

to ever happen this is clearly a society which as I explain in this video was run by a property owning Merchant class in which the merchants support property rights and parliamentary democracy which allows the stability for which Commerce is necess necessary this is also the most effective system in history for economic and social Improvement as I can explain in this text wall as James Burnham liked to say in his book which partly inspired this video or the managerial Revolution World War I was the last war of the capitalist order in World War II the first

of the managerial world for a look at Britain at the end of World War II it was a country with a 95% tax rate in which most Industries including even remarkably steel were naal IED the British Empire was peacefully decolonized and as the managers took greater power even things as ridiculous as what flowers you planted in your garden were regulated by the state I really can't emphasize how much power the managerial class has and how much it can needle into every single aspect of life as a petty personal example of this I used to live

in a town that didn't even have an HOA but the local town would literally find me if I left my trash can at the curb on any day EX except the day they picked up the trash I tested this thesis where I would travel for an extra day and I would leave my trash can out a day early and they would always email me every time even if it was just a single extra day this stuff is more normal than people think if we go through every single aspect of a person's life whether they're work

school romantic religious recreational child rearing you'll find a bureaucracy which needles its way in even things that you would hopefully imagine would be sacred like religion ethnic Pride or sex or the most culturally and sensually Rich things you'll find a bureaucrat telling you that you're doing it wrong Britain is a great and I guess that's not the right word example of this process reaching a point of sheer Ridiculousness it's insane to see what's going on in Britain the only way I can explain things is that it's a true Nanny State tyranny it's literally a legal

and you can go to jail in Britain for having offensive memes on your computer even if you don't share them hate speech is still illegal in Britain even if it's factually true keep in mind we have Technologies now due to the internet and the digital Revolution that Orwell never could have dreamed up in his worst nightmares such as AI capable of mass surveillance as well as the little telescreens we keep in our pockets which know every single detail of Our Lives I'm sure to a horrifyingly precise degree that we can't even understand now Britain is

already installing a national surveillance system and has for decades had cameras in every major public place Ford Motor Company is installing things that listen to people's conversations in the car to see that what the effectiveness of their advertising campaigns are Britain is literally having Jabs for fat people to lower the cost for the NHS through giving them these injections to lower their weight that's tyranny if anything is the horrible thing is I don't really see a counter veing Force in Britain in which their conservatives have become completely controlled by a leftist unip party which just

proves managerial class domination thesis when I look at the new Western form of Nanny State tyranny which manifests very strongly in Britain I see a tyranny so ridiculous which gains its power by its sheer Insanity which blinds its Rivals into a stuper it's remarkable to watch a meme destroy an entire Society read this text wall for the multiple meanings of that statement I'm friends with a lot of British conservatives and it's horrible to see them live through this if you folks want to know more check out the Lotus Eaters podcast which covers the new insane

news coming out of Britain really well although to be frank I am worried that Outlets like this are in danger as the British government corins more towards Madness I have British conservative friends that are leaving the country ASAP since they're afraid for their own safety in somewhere that's becoming a police state my heart really goes out to Britain since partly Britain is so culturally close to America that I know that if it can happen in Britain it can very easily happen here we also see this exact same process occurring in Australia or Canada which are

as insane if not more insane than Britain in a lot of ways almost all of my ancestry is from the British Isles and so these are people who are culturally and genetically my kin although I find the things they are doing disgusting it can really happen here it's also remarkable to me that the British were the people who basically invented Freedom this gets in the way of a lot of racial innate arguments lots of authors from a century ago believed that the Saxon in the kelt was a genetically free race and the events of the

last few years have made me question that very deeply both of my parents were ethnic nationalists with my father being very proud of being Irish and my mom being very proud of being English I guess there's no wonder that they got divorced and I used to think that British people had some kind of cultural aversion to tyranny and I see that that's just not true and it's horrible to see that my ancestors a century ago were clearing the frontier and now we've reached the point where after centuries of maintaining this Republic we will throw it

away for nothing out of boredom and silliness one of the interesting Parts in James Burnham's book on the managerial class is his predictions of the future I spend a lot of time studying people in the past predictions of the future since I also predict the future thus I try to study whatever principles worked in the past James Burnham was writing around World War 2 and much like most of the most advanced rightish thinkers of the last century was a former communist who took a Marxist class analysis and applied it through a rightest frame to start

he did get some stuff right he accurately predicted that the managerial class would be able to sees total control over Society he and Francis the other author who was really inspirational for this video were able to clarify these sheer scope of the cultural differences that would come with this which are difficult for most people to understand both really got how the managerial class would break the world in their own interests largely since Burnham seems to have been a very astute student of the more obvious managerial regimes like Nazi Germany or stalinist Russia however there's one

major detail that Burnham got wrong Burnham predicted the Western world would become completely communist with the total loss of private property in the state consuming everything he said that this was due to the Natural self-interest of the managerial class as I will explain in the next segment as I read through I started to wonder why that didn't happen the best conclusion I could come to is that capitalism is just a superior system holistically to managerial dominance in fact what many of the authors mentioned at the start of this video like McNeil also did not realize

is that when allowed to flow capitalism will beat the managers all the authors implicitly assume that managerialism would have the competitive Advantage probably due to it having one in the military industrial structures of the world wars keep in mind the reason that governments took in the managerial Revolution was because it was necessary to control the sheer scale of military industrial economic structures that occurred with the world wars when we look at the second half of the 20th century the capitalist structures which survived in America due to its Founders establishing a decentralized structure in both National

and Regional governments were able to cause breakthroughs that would beat the managers an example of this is the second world war the Cold War and later the tech revolution in each case the creativity of capitalism was able to defeat the organizational Advantage the managers had this was something I don't fault the authors of the time for not knowing the cold war was in many ways an answer to many questions posited in the previous Century as I explained in this text wall one of the big things that separates us from our very recent ancestors in the

20th century is that they were blinded by the god of progress and reason and as time has passed and we've lived through the consequences we've since lost faith in that God but we have to remember how much it ins snared our ancestors there are two impulses that came with the Godlike power of industrial technology one was towards freedom and another towards slavery which are the two normal impulses of massive breakthroughs as we can normally see in Frontier cultures between the cacs and the Surfs of Eastern Europe or black slavery and the free democracy of North

America what I would like to ultimately say here is that this is not a matter of equality once Britain established the managerial class as its rulers it saw one of the most stunning National collapses ever seen in human history the British went from the wealthiest most technologically culturally strongest nations in the world with the largest empire ever in history to a fourth rate Nation the sun used to never set on the British Empire but now its people are in poverty it has nothing worthwhile to export even culture or intellectual stuff which it used to Pride

itself on and which are the normal pride of a declining once former great Empire once they took in Domination by the managerial class the British lost everything that mattered to them as a nation as the founding fathers would say a man who trains his freedom for security will receive neither in the end the horrible thing is that even though I used Britain as an example here this is a consistent pattern across the whole world today even places you wouldn't think about like Argentina or Indonesia if we look at the nations with the worst birth rights

or the second world's former communist Nations like China Ukraine or Russia is that these are the Nations which the bureaucracy had the most control over these are the oldest nations in the world since they killed their organic cultures like religion Family Folk ways tradition honor so that the people had no reason to live and thus procreate they're also not rich enough to even cover comfortable National retirements like the Germans or the Japanese now let's look at Europe which is a parallel to Britain Europe went from the most advanced place in the world technologically culturally philosophically

militarily economically and being a Dynamo which dominated the whole planet with nearly the whole world either being a European Colony or one step removed from it Europe has now become a museum crashing from 40% of the world's economy in 1968 to 19% now surprisingly none of those Trends occurred in America which is remarkably stayed a constant percent of the world economy since the 60s taking in Europe's former dominance in all of those fields when we look at the growth in the world right now it's an almost perfect match for the weakness of the managerial class

in that growth either happens in places like Texas or Dubai that purposely allow the free market or in poor third world countries that aren't wealthy enough to afford bureaucracies yet part three managerial incentives I spoke earlier about how certain ruling classes have archetypal incentives which you see over their different manifestations what that means is we can look to other societies which the bureaucracy won to see what they did afterwards there are a few examples before in history that we can look to in general Once An Empire gets Beyond a certain size it needs a bureaucracy

by definition to manage its sheer scope anywhere in history the question Beyond this is how much power the bureaucracy gets and can it transplant other ruling classes which rarely happens in most cases the military is able to get a strangle hold on power due to them having the guns to bully the bureaucrats examples of this were 19th century France the ottoman Turks the Roman Empire zaris Russia the Arab caliphate amongst others the only cases where this doesn't happen is in situations in which the external military threats aren't enough for the military to be strong enough

to bully the bureaucracy for an example of a strange Dynamic like this and a good place to talk about the first time in Western history the bureaucracy gained any real power is is the French Revolution I've been on a big French Revolution research Rabbit Hole lately taking from toille whose book on this is unbelievably good I now view the French Revolution as a series of class Wars for control over France pre-revolutionary France was paradoxically an absolutist monarchy which existed to protect a free Society in that the king of France was literally given absolute power for

the purpose of maintaining French people's freedoms France had a combination of different social Elites which compet Ed for power between the church nobility monarchy merchants and bureaucracy the bureaucracy had been grown to express the Monarch's will one of the most brilliant points that toille touches on is that within 2 years of the establishment of a bureaucratic committee whose role was to manage the whole French Kingdom or paralleled to the king the French Revolution took place the point here is that the French Revolution was when the bureaucracy which the King used to realize his own power

themselves realized they didn't need the king and the nobility so they killed them the bureaucracy went a step further and then also tried to replace the church and Merchant class as well as colonized the military with their own supporters this is why the French Revolution failed since the bureaucracy was still fundamentally dependent on an authoritarian King to lead them without that they spiraled into crabs in the bucket envious purges what then happened is that with Napoleon the military became the new King in French society which continued over the 19th century until the bureaucracy could gain

total dominance over France after the horrors of World War I there's a handful of points I want to unpack here the first is that the bureaucracy will always push for authoritarianism first and then totalitarianism by its very design unless like China there's an explicit religious and social structure built against it humans can only really organize through hierarchy or emergent phenomena this is why you either see slavery or surom or capitalis over history when the Communists tried to replace capitalism they had to default on the slavery since that's the only real alternative the bureaucracy since it's

against emergent living phenomena turns the world into controlled matter which they can manipulate thus requiring authoritarian governance when we look at the great Democratic free societies over history like Britain America the Dutch Athenians or Romans when they were their freest and strongest these were societies which had a near complete absence of bureaucracies they were governed through a combination of the free market a strong religion providing social trust and a nobility with a strong sense of social obligation the bureaucracy exists to make sure stuff gets done in the absence of those other social institutions this is

why hyek said The Natural end point of the state's intervention into the economy was the road to surom something which we've seen in the real world as in 1920 90% of Americans were self-employed or worked in small businesses and in 1990 90% were employees thus bureaucracy was strong enough that France could not be a real democracy until it industrialized when the private Market got strong enough democracy stems from the power of the merchant class or a proud warrior nobility which are often the same thing as I explained in this text wall secondly the bureaucracy will

naturally push for totalitarianism given the bureaucracy's natural incentive and remember things follow their incentive without thinking or even often being able to help themselves is towards ual growth this is something Sam Francis explained really brilliantly what has happened and we see this very clearly through the French Revolution is that the bureaucracy made a religion in which they were God and the infinite growth of the bureaucracy was the morally necessary and correct path to choose we often think of liberalism as synonymous with leftist but the reality which I explain in these two videos and this is

why the word liberal is so complex and contradictory is that liberalism is actually two ideologies masquerading the same thing this is what s Francis called Classical liberalism versus consensus liberalism the difference is very much masculine versus feminine or Merchant class versus bureaucracy Classical liberalism stems from Lock and the British Enlightenment culminating in the American Revolution consensus liberalism stems from rouso and leads to the French Revolution both of them cluster around the idea of personal freedom and Abstract but not reality Classical liberalism is freedom from Authority and consensus liberalism is freedom from responsibility Classical liberalism sees

personal freedom as extending from God as the ultimate Arbiter of political Theory consensus liberalism stems from Russo's idea that the will of the people or emotions are the ultimate political Arbiter classical liberals see the freedom as the government not being able to interfere in your life consensus liberals that the government supports you financially allows you to get abortions or stops discrimination making sure things are fair protection from the government to protection by the government let me be clear that class IAL Liberals are the objectively accurate definition of freedom and of the term liberal terms are

completely screwed today as the left purposely obfuscates this stuff as a literal strategy that they admit to however the right left division is this divide inside liberalism in which the classical liberals have a tendency to work with nationalists and religious interests while the consensus liberals with marxists and their descendants we see this in the French Revolution in which the leftist factions then basically matched the leftist Coalition today ranging from people who are close to classical liberals to literal Communists as the French Revolution went on for years the classical liberals gradually lost out authority to people

who were literal socialists what the left's Coalition has in common is that they see bureaucratic bloat as the ultimate religious aim of the human race I explain this more so in this video however the left sees progress which coincidentally is only progress if carried out by the bureaucracy as the only aim of life that's worthwhile when progress occurs under capitalism it doesn't count and when communism fails it also doesn't count having a communist state without a bureaucracy is physically impossible and that's really the point one of the points Sam Francis has made is the left

strategy is picking issues that physically can't be solved by a bureaucracy and thus allowing infinite bureaucratic bloat the issues with ethnic ghettos the hysteria of Kens the innate biological differences between classes races and Sexes inequality hierarchy Empire War struggle a sense of self tradition and the nation itself it's important to see the left as the bureaucracy declaring war on all human and even non-human life trying to rupture and control it all you can give the left all they could ever want and more as we've already done in our society and as we see they'll demand

even more given the bureaucracy demands infinite bloat as it grows the bureaucracy must grow ever bigger like the midgard serpent eating its own tail from this perspective the left sounds completely insane and it is however the reason they were able to even think of this is that the 20th century involved giving the state complete power over almost all aspects of human life literal electricity water and food alongside Work Media and education this is the power the god Emperors of Egypt and Peru would have killed for thus we made the state Our God and the extension

of its power was our religion the first country in Europe to develop a strong centralized bureaucratic state was France and thus that's where leftism first started with the French Revolution I don't think people realize how much power we've already given unelected bureaucratic officials with the executive branch or the FBI and CIA as good examples again these are people the public never consented to but unelected officials appointed them now they control almost every element of human life between economics between who the state spies on between foreign relations even stuff that's romantic or personal life or the

family the bureaucracy has unelected almost infinite power over this is why the American Revolution worked and the French fell into insane despotism almost immediately even though they were both liberal the American Revolution existed with clear boundaries established by the merchant classes in the South slave owning nobility that in order to maintain Freedom you had to separate power in the French Revolution the bureaucracy declared war on human life and society which failed as it has to dville said something so beautiful here that so many in the ruling regime of France during the revolution said they loved

mankind or the nation in abstract and yet you could see them do the worst things to the people around who is the abstract nation of people they love if everyone they actually deal with as an individual they give suffering the left created a false simulacrum or imitation of the world in which the growth of the bureaucracy was ordained by their God of dialectical progress I hope you see from this how the story of the last 200 years has in large part been the growth of the bureaucracy over Western Civilization this isn't just leftism in which

fascism is just as much a managerial ideology the Industrial Revolution and centralization of government demanded Management in order to keep the sheer scale of things cooperating a majority Urban Society demands bureaucracy since humans did not evolve to cooperate on this scale and thus you need paperwork to fill the evolutionary Gap another example posited by the French Revolution is that it's impossible to hold the bureaucracy accountable I talk about this more in the communism video in which the way Communism works by nature is that no one can ever be held accountable for anything this is a

bigger detail than it sounds since it means nothing can be accomplished and you can't have any standards let's say you run a company or a school and you can't fire bad employees you would stop accomplishing anything the irony something that McIntyre touches on very well with his book the total State another very good source on this topic is that the bureaucracy in the modern world was established as a check on the worst most animalistic parts of human nature the irony is it just enables its worst evils this is since the bureaucracy can't be held responsible

for any of its actions and it has no standards to assess itself against this is why the worst atrocities in history such as the Holocaust the Great Leap Forward the hore chin shiong D's tyranny and were all carried out by the bureaucracy bureaucracies exist as a tool to wield power that's their purpose they are established inside structures since they're very good at either extending the reach of power or its duration the problem with that is that they become addicted to power much like the one ring to rule them all the worst part of the bureaucracy

is complete inhumanity and that besides the secret police which is another form of bureaucracy is that it's the least human and living of all the ruling classes this is the origin of Hannah or's theories on the banality of evil in which she studied the Holocaust and found that the humans who perpetuated it were all pretty boring people the logic here is that the bureaucracy can perpetuate the worst evils under the guise of utilitarianism utilitarianism is the idea that that which does the most good for most people is the best the problem with this logic is

that it leaves out context and so without other belief structures utilitarianism can be used to justify the most horrifying evils a majority of wolves voting to eat the minority of sheep modernity thinks evil has to be some gangus con burning cities down but no it can be very ordinary and very boring we've said many negative things about the bureaucracy so far but as a Counterpoint let's look to a society where the bureaucracy has both done the best and also in which it was able to maintain its power stably for thousands of years the only major

pre-industrial Society I can think of in which the bureaucracy gained total social Authority was China interestingly enough the French revolutionaries were obsessed with China and Russo's idea of the social contract stems from the ancient Chinese concept of the Mandate of Heaven China was run by a ruling class called The Mandarin the language Mandarin or the dominant Chinese language today stems from the dialect they spoke in the Middle Ages the mandarins took over China gradually 2,000 years ago under the Han Dynasty China's ruling class was chosen by having young men take a test whoever scored highest

on said test would then be given government positions which they could then financially loot for their own gain families would invest for generations and hope that their children would get said government jobs in order to repay their investment the bureaucracy suppressed China's capitalism and wealthy merchants would in turn buy land and try to get their children government positions as soon as they could to start there were negatives with China's bureaucrat ruling class which we alluded to at the start of this video for most of History China was the wealthiest and most technologically advanced Society in

the world and they invented the printing press gunpowder in the compass however China stagnated for centuries never using any of the technology having colonies or adopting ideas from the West when the British sent a delegation to China in 1791 with technology 500 years more advanced than anything China had the Chinese said the British had nothing to offer them of any interest China nearly had an industrial revolution they sent ships out as far as Kenya and they possibly reached America well each time the bureaucracy actively shut them down either by regulating the factories in the 11th

century or burning the treasure fleets in the 15th China has spent a majority of the last Thousand Years governed by Barbarian conquerors who the Chinese have normally outnumbered 100 to1 since the bureaucracy purposely starved the Chinese military of talent and funding knowing that if it gains enough power it would supplant the bureaucracy if you want to know more watch the video I made on Chinese civilization however even with all of this in the premodern world you could very convincingly argue that China was the most successful civilization in human history ever China was consistently the most

populous United technologically advanced wealthiest civilized state for much of the premodern world China clearly worked as a society while having a bureaucrat so what about China's bureaucratic system allowed them to maintain said stable Society while the bureaucracy in modern history has largely been cancerous part of the answer is that China's religion Confucianism had pre-established protections against the predatory elements in the bureaucracy said bureaucracy was beholden to tradition and forced to study the classics as the predominant selection measure this would be as if America selected its ruling class through Bible study which ends up with a

very different demographic than the current bureaucracy this also prevents them from using the religion of progress to demand continuous growth forever China's bureaucracy had made their peace with the universe not declaring war on life Confucianism very much prioritizes reciprocal relations which created inbuilt measures against predating on the population too horrifically secondly China's bureaucrat nobility were predominantly land owners they were rural people who owned land and then used the revenue from said lands to invest in educating their children so that they could pass the tests this created a connection to both the earth and the people

missing from our current bureaucracy who exists as a separate cast from the population this all reminds me of how the West for the first time since World War II became an elite based off test taking I find this interesting since it's an enormous cultural difference versus the old Elite which stemmed either from being businessmen or being part of the nobility on top of this it backfired very quickly in that college has already within a lifetime failed as a selection tool for a future ruling class the West briefly tried the Chinese system and rejected it nearly

immediately part four the future if you were to ask me what the future of the bureaucracy in the west is I largely think they've doomed themselves in America at least to explain why I will use three words those being internet artificial intelligence and wokeness for the first two we were dependent upon the bureaucracy in an industrialized civilization in which you had to coordinate lots of people at once the internet and AI immediately Crush both of those the internet allows asynchronous emergent cooperation AI could replace all the managerial jobs overnight now we don't need the bureaucracy

anymore for the third the West's experiment with bureaucracy recently has been so cursed I think they're going to end up overstaying their welcome communism and fascism two sides of the managerial coin killed 150 million people combined or by far the bloodiest event in history an interesting thing my friend Sam o berso once said is that the world economic forum is an attempt to automate population collapse in that the world's population needs to Collapse by at least half by the end of this Century the bureaucracies saw this and as the bureaucracies do thought that they should

make a system out of it which they call degrowth degrowth is so incredibly dystopian that I could have never even guessed it would have existed 10 years ago and the reason it's so insane is it's taking something that should never be turned into a system and making it a bureaucracy it's something only our society would be so simultaneously both stupid and intelligent enough to do imagine if the Romans had a government agency called let's import the Goths shrink the economy make the peasants poor and destroy the currency and that was what their ideology told them

to do the problem is the bureaucracy is doing all of that stuff now and they're telling us that it's good the bureaucracy never deals with living people and thus their ability to understand others is ridiculously poor this is why they produce content which just looks completely ridiculous and they should know must horribly backfire examples include the recent guys for commus even kar's vaccine dance or the velcro video If you haven't watched it watch all of those they're comedy gold any normal person would know that a normal person would take these as basically an insult this

is why they're shocked people are angry that they are actively trying to drive their nations in everything they love extinct keep in mind Studies have consistently found conservatives can understand how leftists think but leftists cannot understand how conservatives think at all keep in mind our managerial Elite purposely never cross references their theories against actual humans for example our social sciences make using history to understand the world taboo I made this video on this topic for those who are interested what this means is that our plans for how we govern our elves are basically built off

complete delusional fantasies not grounded in anything real as I said before the left has declared war on human life secondly the bureaucracy established a world so sterile and dead that no one can have kids only a bureaucrat could think of a concept like the current concept of consent if a woman is naked in your bed of her own valtion that's consent not filling out a form before she comes home to your place part of the reason that our birth rate is collapsing so hard and so many young people say it's immoral to have children is

since we live in a world that's so sterile and anti-human that the bureaucracy didn't build it for people but for cogs as the new age starts we need to make an active effort to build a society based around the Crazy Monkeys we are not around some bureaucrats delusions of completely breaking life for the DMV employees