Unknown

Good afternoon everybody. How are you? Good. It's good to see all of you. I want to start by addressing the horrific act of violence that took place on Sunday in Boulder, Colorado. President Trump and the entire administration's hearts go out to the victims and they are in our prayers during this unimaginable time. According to reporting from Fox News, the alleged attacker admitted in an interview that he wanted to kill all Zionist people and had been planning the attack for over a year and would do it again if he could. This monster used a makeshift flamethrower

in Molotov cocktails to light Jewish Americans on fire in an attempt to burn them alive. The victims at the incident location in Boulder were there to rally in support of Israeli hostages who remain in Hamas captivity. 12 were injured, including a Holocaust survivor. This is pure evil. The Department of Justice has already filed federal hate crime charges against the alleged perpetrator, and he will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. This tragedy is a sobering reminder of the consequences of the Biden administration's failed policies. According to the Department of Homeland Security, the

boulder suspect is an Egyptian national who was in the United States illegally. He entered the US during the Biden administration in August 2022 on a B2 visa until it expired. Upon the visa expiration, he overstayed, filed an asylum claim, and was given a work authorization by the Biden administration. Instead of deporting this heinous individual, Joe Biden's administration allowed him to stay in our country and to work. President Trump sounded the alarm over these reckless Biden policies for years because this is the predictable result of letting anti-American radicals and illegal immigrants pour into our country. Immigration

security is national security. And that's why the Trump administration at the direction of our great president has secured our border, strengthened our immigration system, and has taken immediate steps to protect the United States from foreign terrorists and other public safety threats. President Trump acted swiftly upon taking office to reform our visa issuance process to ensure that dangerous aliens who are intent on harming Americans or our national security interests are no longer admitted into our country. Under the Trump administration, aliens will only be admitted into the United States through the legal process and only if they

do not bear hostile attitudes towards our citizens, our culture, our government, our institutions, or most importantly, our founding principles. Under President Trump, the United States has zero tolerance for foreign visitors who support terrorism. Violators of US law, including international students, will continue to face visa denial or revocation and deportation, and illegal alien criminals will continue to be arrested and deported from our country. On that note, ICE and federal law enforcement partners just wrapped up a month-long surge operation, arresting nearly 1500 illegal aliens in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. During the enhanced operation dubbed Operation Patriot, ICE

Boston and other federal law enforcement personnel focused on transnational organized crime, gangs, and dangerous illegal alien offenders. Throughout mass, more than half of the nearly 1500 illegals arrested had significant criminal convictions or charges pending against them. Here are just some of the violent illegal aliens who were removed from communities in Massachusetts during Operation Patriot. a Salvadorian national with active interpol red notice for aggravated homicide. A Guatemalan national and registered sex offender who had pending criminal charges in Boston for five counts of indecent assault and battery on a person 14 or over. A Honduran national who

was last arrested for rape, indecent assault, and battery of a person 14 or over. a Colombian national charged with kidnapping, aggravated rape, and indecent assault, and battery on a person 14 or over. And a Guatemalan national who was convicted of murder in Boston. Also, a Brazilian national who was charged with aggravated rape of a child by force in possession of child pornography. Again, these are people who were living in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. And lastly, a Salvadorian national whose criminal history includes char charges of aggravated rape of a child by force. I don't think anybody

in this room wants these types of heinous criminals in your communities. And it's thanks to this administration that they are being removed from our country. When Democrat-run jurisdictions released violent illegal alien criminals back into communities after making arrests instead of turning them over to federal immigration enforcement like they should, those Democrats are putting law-abiding Americans at risk. And these insane policies force law enforcement officials to make much more difficult arrests that put their lives, our law enforcement lives in jeopardy. President Trump is incredibly grateful for our heroic officers on the front lines getting these violent

illegal alien invaders out of our communities. Law and Order is back in America under President Trump. And on that same note, there are new uh crime statistics that show crime is plummeting. In fact, Politico summed it up like this. Murder rates are tumbling across the US in 2025. Homicide stats are down at least 20% over last year and we could be on course for the lowest number on record. With President Trump in charge, the days of criminals being put over victims are over. On the topic of immigration, the Washington Post just ran one of the

most ridiculous headlines ever, even by their standards. And on my very first briefing several months ago, I said I would hold anyone accountable in this room. The Washington Post actually had this headline, the mysterious drop in fentanyl seizures on the US Mexico border. How is this mysterious? There is no mystery about why there is a decrease in fentanyl coming into the United States. This administration's strong border policies are the reason there has been a decrease in fentanyl trafficking. his strengthened relationship with uh Mexican President Shinbomb and all of the measures he has been taking to

deter illegal human and drug trafficking at our United States southern border is the reason for plummeting fentanyl seizures at the US border. There is nothing mysterious about that and we'd like to see the Washington Post update their headline accordingly. This is clearly trying to intentionally manipulate the minds of the of Americans and I think the American people understand why there's been a fentanyl drop. In our office responded to this inquiry, we provided a whole host of the reasons that fentanyl seizures at the southern border have dropped and the Washington Post refused to run them and

that's despicable. In other news, positive economic reports continue to flood in. Inflation dropped to 2.1% in April. Personal income increased 8% in April. So inflation is down and wages are up. That's almost triple the expectations and against the doubts of nearly everyone in this room. And we also saw the largest monthly decline in the trade deficit on record as a result of President Trump's very powerful tariffs. Lastly, the price of eggs has dropped more than 61% since President Trump took office in January. I remember my very first briefing I was asked about the cost of

eggs. The reporter tried to insinuate it was this administration's fault, even though he had only been here for a few days or weeks. It was a result of the previous administration's terrible policies. And in record time, this president has fixed that problem that he inherited from Joe Biden. And now egg prices have dropped 61% since this president took office. There's a lot of good news and I'm sure you have a lot of questions. So, let's get to them. We have uh just the news in our new media seat today. Amanda Head, thank you for being

with us. Why don't you kick us off? Sure. Thank you so much. Um, there is a disturbing trend of anti-semitism turning into terrorism. Of course, the Boulder, Colorado incidents that you just mentioned, the two Israeli embassy staffers who were murdered, Pennsylvania governor's mansion with the Jewish governor inside getting uh set on fire. Does the president consider this domestic terrorism? And as such, are there official alerts to law enforcement, bolos, task forces, things like that? The president has made it very clear as he said in his statement yesterday that yes, these anti-semitic acts of violence are

uh qual do qualify as terrorism and he does not want to see terrorism or violence of any form taking place in the United States of America. And as for specifically anti-semitic terrorism and anti-semitic acts of violence and those that are targeting Jewish Americans, this administration has done more to combat that violence than any administration in history. And one incident is one too many. And I think frankly that's something the previous administration was not willing to say. This president will stand up for Americans of all religions, of all faiths, of all creeds. Um, and we will

continue to look at policy uh measures and actions that we can take in addition to the actions that have already been taken to curb this anti-semitic violence. And to Jewish Americans at home across the country, this president has your back. And then on another issue, um, back in February, Secretary Kennedy created a commission to re-examine the childhood vaccine schedule, but there are still states outstanding like California, Connecticut, Maine that are not allowing any religious exemptions for kids not only to go to school, but to participate in sports and extracurricular activities. Would the president want to

see religious exemptions allowed across all 50 states? and and how do you enforce that especially with states like California that are already defying the president on the men and women sports? Generally speaking, I know the president supports religious exemptions for families when it comes to vaccinations. As for the instances in those specific uh states, I'll have the administration and the White House look into it and see what executive action, if any, we can take on that front. Thank you, Kelly. Good afternoon. We're now in hur we're in hurricane season and uh obviously uh there is

great concern every year about the potential for that. Can you speak to how the president is um planning to have the level of uh support should it be needed to be as it has been with a reduction in the workforce and is he still comfortable with administrator Richardson who had talked whether joking or not about not being aware of a hurricane season for this country? what is uh the president's level of briefings on what may be required if you could give us kind of an overall update on that. Sure. Well, of course, we know that

we are into hurricane season now and I know FEMA is taking this seriously seriously contrary to some of the reporting we have seen based on jokes that were made and leaks from meetings. Uh but Secretary Christine and the FEMA leadership are all over this. They are committed to ensuring that federal resources and tax dollars are there for Americans in need. Uh and the president continues to review requests for emergency aid and carefully considering them. Uh however, this president has made it clear, we're not going to enable states to make bad decisions with federal tax dollars

and then have the federal government later have to bail these states out. We want to see states uh be responsible with their tax dollars to do as much as they possibly can and then the president will deeply and thoughtfully consider any requests for federal aid that come to his desk. Um, and I think some of the media reporting we've seen on this is frankly sloppy and irresponsible. Uh, there are serious people who are taking this issue seriously. Starting with the president himself, who as you know on his first domestic trip back in office, visited both

North Carolina and California, both of which were of course hit by natural disasters when he wasn't even president. But he took ownership of that and visited those places and those people immediately. Is it about hurricane season appropriate though now that we're we're this is serious business as you talked about? It's serious business, Kelly, and I'm not going to engage in such fodder with a question like that, Brian. Thank you, Caroline. Um, Reuters was reporting that there is a letter that is meant to be sent to other countries, which would give these countries a deadline of

Wednesday to produce their best offer on the trade matter. Why does the administration feel the need to send this letter? And I have one more followup on trade. Sure, I can confirm the merits in the content of the letter. USR sent this letter to all of our trading partners just to give them a friendly reminder that the deadline is coming up. Um, and they are in talks, Ambassador Greer, Secretary Besson, and Secretary Lutnik are in talks with many of our key trading partners around the globe as you know, Brian, I know the Wall Street Journal

has covered this quite heavily. um and they continue to be engaged in those discussions and this letter was simply to remind these countries that the deadline is approaching and the president expects good deals and we are on track for that. Uh I will emphasize on the trade side though when the deal with the United Kingdom there was this idea of a reprieve for on the auto tariffs. Um, is the president looking to do another similar deal on on the sector by sector reduction tariffs or is this more going to be deals related to the reciprocal

tariffs that were announced months ago? Well, as I've said previously from the podium and the president has discussed as well, each country has unique advantages, unique challenges to it based on their markets and what they export to us and what we export to them. And so that's why the president smartly uh advised his trade team to engage in tailormade dealm and we saw that with the United Kingdom. Um and we will see that with other countries as well. Kate, uh does the president support the Senate moving forward with a bill imposing heavy sanctions on Russia?

Look, the president has spoken about his position on sanctions on Russia. He has smartly kept this as a tool in his toolbox if necessary. But I think the Senate and everyone on Capitol Hill respects the president is the commander-in-chief for a reason. Um, and as you know, Russia and Ukraine engaged in direct talks yesterday. That was at the encouragement of this president when he spoke to both leaders of both countries via phone just a couple of weeks ago. Um, and so I would just like to remind everybody how far we have come in just four

months. I mean, it was inconceivable last year at this time for Russia and Ukraine to be engaged in direct talks. And it's because of the president's insistence and determination to get this war to an end that these countries sat down yesterday. So he's willing to use sanctions if he needs them in the Senate and in the Capitol Hill understand that the president is the commander-in-chief and he's leading United States foreign policy as he should. And on Iran, the president said that the US would not allow for any uranium enrichment, but the proposal offered to the

Iranians um reportedly allows for low levels of enrichment. Can you explain that discrepancy? I'm not going to comment on alleged details of the report. We're not going to negotiate through the media out of respect for these ongoing discussions and negotiations that special envoy WhitF is leading. The president made his position very clear on Truth Social last night. In fact, it couldn't be any more clear. Uh and I would reiterate that's his position. Special envoy WhitF sent a very detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime that the president hopes they will accept. uh and if

not they will face grave consequences as the president himself has reiterated. Um sure. Thanks. You're welcome. Um a couple of things if I may. Um firstly, can you confirm whether or not um President Trump is going to be going to the NATO summit in the H later this month? I can confirm he will be going to the NATO summit. Yes. Okay. Great. Thanks. And another question on the Netherlands. In fact, um the um just wondering if you have any reaction to the collapse of the the Dutch government there um after the anti-U EU and anti-Islam

leader Gilders who's been described as a Dutch Trump um pulled out of the government there. I don't have a comment on that, but certainly we should and we will and we will get you one. Okay. Thanks. You're welcome. Brett, thanks Caroline. Uh I wanted to ask a couple days ago the president announced uh that he was withdrawing the nomination of uh of Jared Isikman to lead NASA. um citing a thorough review of prior associations. I wondered why did this review happen just now after the nominee was so far into the process. Uh and can you

explain the president's thinking on who he might choose? Look, the president reserves the right to nominate individuals to key administration posts, he also reserves the right to remove those individuals if he chooses, just like he reserves the right to fire anybody in the executive branch that he wants. And so a new replacement for NASA will be announced very soon as the president himself said. Was there something in particular that came up that caused the president concerned with this nomination? The president wants to ensure that all of his nominees are aligned fully with the America first

mission of this administration and again he will be announcing a replacement very soon. Uh Andrew, go ahead. Uh thank you Caroline. You're welcome. It's it's been just about a month since President and Prime Minister Starmer announced I can't see you all the way back there in the very There you go. Yeah. So, it's been uh just about a month since Prime Minister Starmer and President Trump announced that uh the US and UK had reached a trade deal or at least a framework from a deal. Uh now, there are at least some conservative uh MPs in

London who are complaining that parliament has not yet seen the text of any deal. Uh so I'd like to ask you from this side of the pond, is there a text for the deal ready to be uh released, submitted, and if not, when can we expect it? And then I have one more. Uh there's most definitely text with this deal. There is language that this side has seen. You'll have to ask the UK parliament why they haven't seen it from their own government. I obviously can't answer that question. And on Caroline, one more on Ukraine,

please. Sure. Go ahead. on on Ukraine. Uh it's been a couple days since uh Ukraine made that audacious drone strike on Russian airfields. The president hasn't said a word about it and usually he's not shy about making his thoughts uh known on the war or it's not bad uh on on the war or any other subject. Um what what are what have you heard from him on this uh audacious drone strike? Is he surprised? He said that Zalinski didn't have the cards when uh they met in the Oval Office a few uh months back. Does

Zalinski possibly have some cards that the president uh and hadn't known about? Look, the president's thinking on the Russia Ukraine war as it stands. I've spoke to him about it just this morning is he remains positive at the progress that we've seen. Again, he urged both leaders to sit down and talk directly with one another and they did that. Russia handed over a memorandum of of peace or a peace plan or a suggestion of one, I understand, to the Ukrainian side. They also agreed upon the exchange of prisoners or hostages from each other's countries. So,

he remains positive about the progress that we're seeing, but he also is a realist and he realizes these are two countries that are at war and have been for a long time because of um his predecessors weakness and incompetence. So, he's working hard to solve this conflict and that's where his mind is right now on it. Jonathan, go ahead. Thank you. Um, same topic. Just to put a finer point on it, does President Trump approve of Ukraine's decision to strike nuclear capable bombers in Russia? I would like to let the president speak on that himself.

And just to follow up, um, has the president I would just add to that. The president does not want to see this war prolonged. He wants the fighting to stop. He wants people to stop dying and he wants this to be solved at the negotiating table. The reason he is so deeply involved and has spent so much time and effort on this war is because he hates to see people dying. Again, these are not Americans that are being killed. These are Russians and these are Ukrainians. This is a war very far away. But this president

truly cares about peace and that's what he wants to see. What is President Trump doing to ensure that a similar internal drone attack doesn't happen here in the US given this was done at pretty low cost very stealthily. You know, it obviously raises questions about our own security particularly for US aircraft here. It absolutely does and that's why the president nominated Secretary Hegsth and has approved some of the changes that have been made at the Pentagon to ensure that we have the most lethal fighting force in the world and that the United States military is

the best, the biggest. That's why he wants the one big beautiful bill to be passed because it increases our defense spending. It's why he also launched the announcement of the Golden Dome to prevent from missile strikes and attacks in the future. And the president has a full understanding, I can tell you because I've spoken to him about it about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that. And I will not get ahead of our policy team, but I think you can expect to see some executive action on that front in

the very near future. Caroline Caitlyn, uh, two questions for you as well. On the big beautiful bill, you said recently that it is quote blatantly wrong to say that it adds to the deficit. You essentially said that an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers you believe are wrong. But Republicans like Ron Johnson and Ran Paul disagree. They are saying that it will add to the deficit. That is their concern. Is the White House's position that those two Republican senators are quote blatantly wrong? It is those senators uh it's not news that they

disagree with this president on policy. U and the president has vocally called them out for it and for them not having their facts together. I would add the Congressional Budget Office has been historically wrong. In fact, they predicted the Trump tax cuts from the president's first term in 2017. They that their prediction was wrong by half a trillion dollars. Those tax cuts in uh had more nearly a half trillion dollars more of revenue than the Congressional Budget Office scored. And I would also point out, I don't think many people know this, there hasn't been a

single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000. But guess what? There have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democrat candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political. And we are very confident in our own economic analyses of this bill. There is$ 1.6 trillion in savings. And our office of management and budget director, Russ Fa, is a fiscal hawk. He is well known in this city for being

a wellrespected fiscal hawk. He has tools at his disposal to produce even uh more savings. And as you know, the White House will be sending our recisions package to Capitol Hill today. And on immigration, uh the other day that the the Homeland Security Secretary said, and I'm quoting her now, that an illegal alien threatened to assassinate President Trump and highlighted his arrest. A man has now admitted to framing him, saying that he wrote the letter that the DHS secretary, Christine Gnome, posted online. Last I checked, before I came into the room, that post was still

up from DHS. Does the White House expect them to issue a clarification or a correction on that? We can ask the Department of Homeland Security and get back to you. Jeff, uh Caroline, is the United States putting pressure on China to release its hold on rare earths that are hurting car companies and technology companies now that require that for their for their products and and is that pressure working? Well, I can assure you that the administration is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement. I know the United States on our end, we have

complied with the terms that we set and our administration officials continued to be engaged in correspondence with their Chinese counterparts and as you all know and I know there's a lot of interest in it uh there will be a leadertoleer talk very soon and when that happens as always um we will let you know. Also in Asia just does the White House have a reaction to the results of the uh election in South Korea? Yes, we do. In fact, let me find it here for you. should be somewhere in here. Thank you. Um, we do

not, but I will get you one, Jeff. Go ahead. Thanks, Kelly. Two questions on trade. Is this letter that was sent to trading partners a sign that the president isn't satisfied with the pace of these negotiations? Is he trying to light a fire under these talks now? Well, look, the president has been very direct to our trading partners and his conversations with them and with foreign leaders directly that they need to cut deals with the United States of America. the tariff agenda of this president. He believes very strongly in it. And as you've all seen,

he's unafraid to use tariffs to protect our industries and protect our workers, but he wants to see these tailor made deals be signed. And I will tell you, of course, we I I never want to be the one negotiating with the press about these internal discussions and deliberations, but um our team who is deeply involved in this um sees these deals moving in the right direction. In fact, Ambassador Greer is in Paris right now meeting with many of our trading partners. We should still expect this flurry of deals in the next 36 days and the

plan is still for those full tariffs to go back into effect on July. The plan is for the announcement of these deals to be made very very soon. Yes. Sure. Thank you, Caroline. Um, you're welcome. So, Governor Whitmer confirmed that she spoke with uh President Trump about the possibility of pardoning the uh the plotters against her, the kidnapping case. She didn't give us a uh an idea of what the president's reaction was to that. Do you have any information about what he said? Well, I won't reveal the president's private discussion unless he gives me liberty

to, but I will reiterate what he said publicly when he was asked by one of the journalists in this room in the Oval Office a couple of weeks ago about the pardons. He said it's something he would look at. Nothing more, nothing less. Uh Haley, go ahead. Thanks Carol. And then to Kelly next to you. Thank you. Um when it comes to the leaderto leader call with Xiinping this week, what is the president's expectation of this call? Is he looking for concrete outcomes out of this or is he looking to kind of um warm relations

as these trade talks are ongoing? Well, President Trump and President Xi have shared a respectful relationship throughout the years. Uh and again, I won't get ahead of the president on that uh call, but as always after, you'll hear directly from the president or from myself or someone else here at the White House. Kelly Caroline, thank you. I I want to get back to the anti-semitic behavior that's been going on on college campuses as well as recently in Boulder, Colorado. Uh the president, as you know, has the White House faith office, the religious liberty commission, as

well as the anti-task force on uh anti-Christian bias, which includes anti-semitism. Uh from a whole of government perspective, and the president has already mentioned how he hates these kinds of of acts that have been going on. Can these entities and these agencies work together with the president to put out a proactive campaign to help people stop the hate? I think the president himself has been leading on this, Kelly, and has been incredibly clear in his rhetoric that he is not going to tolerate such hate or behavior in the United States of America. And you will

see that rhetoric being followed up by action from the Department of Justice who is seeking to prosecute these cases to the fullest extent of the law. And I know the attorney general and the FBI director were very quick to call this what it was, targeted terrorism. And there was some um I think criticism from the media and at least pundits I saw on television saying, "Are they too quick to jump here?" No, they see the facts and they reveal those to the American people and they're transparent. Uh and I think frankly that's a breath of

fresh air from what we experienced in the previous administration. Are there programs that they can put in place to campaign against this kind of violence? uh to actually take the whole approach and say we want to get ahead of you. If you're thinking it, don't do it. And if you're going to do it, sit down and talk to someone within the faith office, within the religious liberty commission as well as the task force. Yeah, surely it's a good idea and I'll pass it along to them. Peter, thank you Caroline. When you look at these last

minute Biden pardons, the big ones, Biden siblings, Fouchy, January 6th committee. That's right. Most of the big ones have the same very neat signature. We would expect that probably to be the autopen. There is one that looks different. It looks authentic. In fact, if you look at the last name, it almost looks like the president was having a hard time spelling his last name. There is this White House of the opinion that the only pardon that would count is one that the president signed himself. It's very interesting. Very interesting. Props. If you want to bring

them to my office later so I can take a closer look, I would like to do that. Uh, the president is making a good point when he discusses the usage of the autopen. Who was running the country for the past four years? Perhaps those documents were signed with the auto pen. Something that this uh I believe the Department of Justice is looking into as you saw Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice this morning to launch an investigation because the American people deserve answers. Is there any concern that this president who won

the election on a promise to fix the economy and close the border uh that focusing and scrutinizing these Biden pardons is looking into the past instead of looking forward? I think in comparison to the amount of time this president has spent on securing the border, on fixing our economy, I just read out for you an entire list of accomplishment, economic accomplishments. Look at the border numbers. Look at the time and effort he's divulged into solving the global conflicts abroad. It pales in comparison, but it still nevertheless is a very important issue and it was a

huge issue that sent the president back to this White House. The Americans saw with their own eyes a mentally incompetent president and they want answers for that and the president believes they should have and something that just crossed Caroline. How mad do you think President Trump is going to be when he finds out that Elon Musk said, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork fililled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it. Look, the president already

knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big beautiful bill and he's sticking to it. Thank you. The National Security Council was reorganized or some some staffing changes were made uh the Friday before Memorial Day. I'm hoping you can explain um sort of the the new structure, what the structure is of the National Security Council, what the goal is in terms of staffing levels. Um, you know what what is the new National Security Council mo mode? Well, as with everything in this White House, it is a

top- down approach. The president is here. He is president. He's not an autopen like the previous president was. He's very much involved in literally every policy discussion and decision that takes place. And it we felt it was best to reorganize the National Security Council to respond to th that top- down approach that we have here in this White House. um and to streamline the efficiency and the effectiveness of the National Security Council. And I would add that Secretary of State Rubio and now National Security Adviser Rubio is doing a tremendous job at leading the National

Security Council. He knows the president. He understands where the president is on these issues. He's great to work with here at the White House. I can tell you that. I appreciate seeing him a lot more in the building. Um and he and the president and the entire National Security Council who's made up of great patriots who love this country are doing a tremendous job on the many conflicts uh around the world that this administration inherited. Is there a goal staffing level? I'm sorry. Is there a goal for the staffing level like the number of people

who would be in this national security? We just want the the uh National Security Council to be as efficient as possible and uh if staffing needs are necessary. I'm sure Secretary Rubio would not mind hiring people if necessary. But again, we've been working with them day in and day out and they're chugging along and doing great work. Sure. Thank you. Thank you, Caroline. Uh, two questions if I can. President Trump got involved himself in presidential election in Poland by supporting a conservative candidate who ultimately won. Yeah. Uh, what does it mean for the future uh,

US Polish relations? What's likely to change? Uh, well, I I believe um the president is obviously pleased to see the result of the Polish elections. He met with Carol Naraki, if I'm pronouncing that correctly. Yes, Naratski. Uh, okay. Thank you. I appreciate your insight on that. Um, he met with him at the White House and he told them, "You're going to win because you support common sense." And he supported strong borders in Poland. He supported an end to the woke uh radical DEI stuff that we've seen not just here in the United States but really

take over Europe and frankly the whole world. He was very outspoken about that. Um and I was reading the reports about how the Polish people felt about this man and they felt like he was putting the needs of Poland first and that's a very refreshing feeling, one that we know very well here in the United States of America. So um as you know the United States and Poland have always had a very deep and strong relationship, friendship. They're a great ally and I know the president continues to look forward to working with them. We have

one more uh on Ukra Ukrainian uh drone attack on Russia. Was President Trump informed in advance by Ukraine that the attack is coming? He was not Carrie Caroline. Uh so just want to go back to the issue on the anti-Christian uh bias as well as issues on issues. Uh, Senator Grassley just uh put out a a report saying that the files FBI files has showed that the uh Catholic group targeting was way more uh prevalent within the FBI during the Biden era than was previously uh shown as far as former FBI director Christopher Ray was

uh was putting out there during congressional testimony. Uh can you uh discuss here uh with the uh what President Trump would like to see in terms of consequences within the FBI as far as those who were involved? Also a second question uh if the DOJ finds that the autopen was used by uh by President Biden. Uh should those actions that were used with the autopen should they be null and void? I'm not going to get ahead of the Department of Justice's investigation into the uh usage of the auto pen. And the again, the question is

not was the auto pen used, it's whether or not the president of the United States knew it was being used and if not, who was using it in his name, which is clearly uh illegal behavior. Diana, thanks Caroline. Um, one on foreign policy, one domestic, if I can. Sure. on foreign just speaking to the president's truth social post about Iran recently um saying that there will be no uranium enrichment. Is he saying that that's a red line for him or no? I already answered this question. The president's been very clear about where he stands on

that. Okay. And then on domestic um there is a report that Laura Loomer met with the vice president today. Can you speak to her relationship with the administration and if you know if she's informally advising in any way? She is not. I do know she met with the vice president. As for what was discussed in that meeting, I would defer you to his team. Thanks, Caroline. I have one question on anti-semitism, one question on China. So, for years, radical leftists and Islamists have been calling for so-called to so-called globalize the antifat. Um, do you believe

this is a call for violence against Jews? And do you think these attacks on Jews around our country is what globalizing the antifat looks like? I I don't want to speak to the merits of those claims without looking into them, but as I said, any violence against Jewish Americans will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Absolutely. And also, Secretary of State Rubio made an announcement saying he'll be revoking visas of certain Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party. Does that include sons and daughters of politicians, presidents, and chairman?

Again, Secretary of State Rubio has the right to revoke visas and he made the announcement that the State Department will uh begin to aggressively revoke those visas of Chinese uh students who are in our country, namely those with Chinese Communist Party ties or those who could be a threat to our national security and the interests of the United States. Um to both of you. Yeah, go ahead and then back up. Yeah, thank you. There are now reports that Israeli forces are firing on Palestinians uh trying to get aid uh from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation after

20 people according to the Red Cross have arrived uh to the uh hospital that they've set up with gunshot wounds uh have died from them. Um is this administration aware of these and I mean what is being done to address uh this this situation? The administration is aware of those reports and we are currently looking into the veracity of them because unfortunately unlike some in the media uh we don't take the word of Hamas with total truth. We like to look into it when they speak. Unlike the BBC uh who had multiple headlines they wrote,

"Israeli tank kills 26. Israeli tank kills 21. Israeli gunfire kills 31. Red Cross says 21 people were killed in an aid incident. And then, oh wait, they had to correct and take down their entire story, saying, "We reviewed the footage and couldn't find any evidence of anything." Oh, okay. So, we're going to look into reports before we confirm them from this podium or before we take action. And I suggest that journalists who actually care about truth do the same to reduce the amount of misinformation that's going around the globe on this front. Can you talk

about the change in the leadership of the organization? What does that mean going forward? And why why why so early on is this is this happening? what organization because of humanitarian foundation. Well, look, this was a creative idea that the president called for to get aid into the region. These people uh were desperate and starving and the president didn't like seeing imagery of that and he wanted to ensure that aid was brought in uh with the approval of Israel for understandable reasons. We will never forget the brutal attack on October 7th. Um and again, this

is something that the previous administration was unwilling to put the time and effort into doing. John, thanks a lot. Caroline, I want to bring it back to the way you began your briefing talking about the president's mass deportation program. Sure. And his priorities. 40% of crop farm workers in the US are undocumented and that's according to the agriculture department. Do they have a carveout in terms of the president's mass deportation program? The president and the Trump administration have been very clear. If you are in the country illegally, you are subject to deportation. Is there any

concern that given that large number, if that number is correct, 40% of crop farm workers being undocumented, that that could impact the food supply here in America if those individuals that obviously help pick crops all across the country are deported and mass. Again, uh this administration is focusing focused on deporting individuals who are in our country illegally. It's something we have to do. We cannot allow the previous administration's invasion of our country of illegal immigrants to uh continue. We just can't have it. And this is a law and order president. As for our farmers and

their concerns, they have a president who has their backs and listens to their concerns uh and hears them. But we also have a legal pathway to come to this country and work in specifically for agricultural work. So there's a legal way to do it and we encourage uh that p that legal pathway and we're currently working on strengthening our legal immigration system for that reason. Sure. Thank you Caroline. Um I just wanted to follow up on uh your statement last week regarding the MA report. Sure. Um you said that there was uh you said I

understand there were some formatting issues with the Maha report that are being addressed and that report will be updated. Um, we also understand that since that there have been some citations that came about. There's citations of studies that either did not exist or did not back up the report's conclusions. So, when you were referring to formatting errors, um, is that what you were talking about or was it so could you just explain that? Yeah, that's what I was talking about. There were formatting errors and those errors were updated by the proper policy components here at

the White House and a new report was issued. Exactly what I said took place. Sure. Go ahead, Alec. Yeah, good to see you. Good to see you. Congresswoman uh Mary Miller suggested that changing Pride Month to family month. I would personally like to see maybe a nuclear family month. Some people are saying, "Let's get a veterans month." Does the president have any plans on making a proclamation or is it just going to be June this year? Uh there are no plans for a proclamation for the month of June, but I can tell you this president

is very proud to be a president for all Americans regardless of race, religion, or creed. Caroline Reagan, go. Thank you, Caroline. And then I'll go to you. Thank you. Colorado passed sanctuary protections for illegals one month before the terrorist attack uh this weekend. Two questions. Why did the DHS remove the sanctuary cities list that had published which was ordered by the president? And then what is the administration going to do to further crack down on sanctuary jurisdictions to prevent attacks like what happened in Colorado? Sure. The Department of Homeland Security will be issuing a new

list of sanctuary cities, uh an accurate list of sanctuary cities. As for what we're doing to crack down, the president has signed uh various executive orders and has directed the attorney general um to prosecute uh federal uh state and local officials who are not complying with federal immigration force uh authorities and most importantly federal immigration law. Thanks Carolyn. Thank you Caroline. Oh yeah. Um go ahead. So does uh the president take calls from foreign leaders on the tariffs on steel and aluminium? Does he still intend to double them tomorrow morning? The president will be signing

that executive order today and steel and aluminum tariffs will be going to 50%. Yes. No way it's going to change or it's going to be suspended. He made that announcement in Pennsylvania and he plans to deliver on that promise to Pennians. And why is he hiking? And Ed, go ahead. I can answer that, but go ahead. Oh yes, thank you Caroline. So a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson today said that the US imposed harmful measures like new chip controls and pledging to revoke Chinese student visas. So, are the Chinese the victims in this trade back and

forth? Look, I don't think anyone is the victim. These are two strong countries and as I said, the president uh has a good relationship with China's president and leader. Uh and that discussion will take place later this week. And what other authorities is the president looking at for tariffs um should the decision and the appeals court not go his direction? Well, right now his tariffs remain in effect. We spoke at length in our my briefing last week about that uh decision that came down from the international trade court which has been put on pause because

the president absolutely does have the authority to implement tariffs and to declare a national emergency for our crippling trade deficit. He is uh could always have the power to use section 202 or section 301 as well to impose tariffs if he deems necessary especially section 202 tariffs which are sectoral as you know to protect our critical supply chains here at home. Thanks Caroline. You're welcome. Uh you've got US business leaders begging for certainty. So why did the president suddenly decide to hike tariffs on steel and aluminum again? You also have US business leaders begging to

meet with this president and begging uh to come to the White House to uh talk to him because they know that he is a negotiator and chief that he's making good deals on behalf of the American worker and the steel worker in particular when it comes to the steel and aluminum tariffs which he discussed in his speech at length at Pennsylvania and the need for them. And I would just add, I was at that speech on Friday with the president and there were 2,000 steel workers and their families in the room, many of them wearing

their hard hats. I spoke to one backstage who said, "This is the greatest thing that has happened for that community in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 60 years." Because this is a president who doesn't just talk the talk, he walks the walk, too. Uh, and he's delivering on his promises to bolster our steel and aluminum industries in this country and to protect those jobs. If not for this president, that steel plant in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania would have closed. Those jobs would have uh been lost. And the president saved that company. He saved those jobs and he's saving that

community. And that's the intention of the steel tariffs which he will sign later this afternoon. Thank you very much everyone. We'll see you later. Thank you.