Full interview: President Trump says he’ll be a ‘two-term president,’ downplays third-term talk

President Trump, welcome back to Meet the Press. Thank you very much. Thank you so much for being here to mark your first 100 days in office. It has been an incredibly busy 100 days. You've signed more than 140 executive orders. You've been focused on the border, the economy, foreign policy. What is your biggest goal in the next 100 days? Well, I think we're going to see a lot of results. We've already seen them. On the border, we have the best border in the history of our country. It was 99.999 and nobody ever thought that was

possible. In fact, Biden, if you remember, said he has to get legislation. And I said, "No, you just need a new president." And I guess I was right. We have the best border we've ever had. We're doing great on uh illegal immigration. We are being hit hard by judges that I think they're trying to take away the power of the presidency. I was elected in a massive landslide in a big, you know, big vote. We won the swing states. We won the popular vote. We won the district votes by tremendous numbers. We won everything. And

uh one of the reasons, one of the primary reasons I was elected was to uh get people out of our country that were allowed. We have prisoners. We have murderers. We have terrorists in our country. We have people from mental institutions that are seriously insane. They all came in through Biden's open border policy. and I was elected to get them out and to seal the border, but to get them out. And we'll have judges or activist judges. They're saying, "Well, you know, you don't have the right to take out murderers and and people that you

don't even want to talk about." These are really some really bad uh criminal people and they're here illegally. So, you know, they talk about your next question will be due process, but they talk about due process, but do you get due process when you're here illegally? We're going to talk about all of that. We are going to talk about deportation, but I want to start on the economy, sir, which obviously the biggest issue for voters. We got new numbers today, better than expected job numbers, much better. At the same time, the economy uh shrank in

the first quarter. You've been arguing all week that this is President Biden's economy. Is this now your economy, sir? Well, I think certain aspects of it are costs are I was able to get down the cost, but even that it takes a while to get them down, but we got them down good. We lost five to six billion dollars a day with Biden. Five to six billion. And I've got that down to a great number right now in a very in a record time. You know, we're talking about a hundred days. But just think of

what that is.$5 billion dollars a day we're losing on trade. And uh we were very tough with China as you know. We put 145% tariff on. Nobody's ever heard of such a thing. And we've essentially uh cut off uh trade relationships by putting that much of a tariff on. And that's okay. We've gone cold turkey. That means that we're not losing, you know, we lost a trillion dollars to China. A trillion dollars. That means we're not losing a trillion dollars when we go cold turkey because we're not doing business with them right now. and they

want to make a deal. They want to make a deal very badly. We'll see how that all turns out, but it's got to be a fair deal. But think of it, we're losing a trillion dollars and uh that was a big part of the $5 million a day. And I want to talk about China, but just staying on this idea of the economy. On the eve of your inauguration, the stock market spiked. You called it the Trump effect. Are you It spiked because I was elected president. It spiked because of anybody else. spike because they

see what I'm going to do. They know what I'm going to do with the tariffs and everything else. And I think it's actually working out better than we anticipated. Did you see oil prices? Did you see gasoline is now below in many cases in many states below $2 a gallon, 198 1997? Well, my I my question, sir, is you when the stock market spiked, you said this is the Trump effect. When the numbers weren't so good earlier this week, you said it's the Biden effect. Are you only taking ownership of the good numbers and not

the bad numbers? I I think he did a lot of very bad things and despite some of the bad things, we're overcoming them. But he was bad on the border. He was bad on the economy. We had the worst inflation in the history of our country. Look, Biden gave us the worst inflation in the history of our country. People, it didn't matter what they made because they were losing their shirt because of costs. Now, take a look at what happened. Oil is down. Gasoline is down. Groceries are down. Eggs. You were the one that asked

me. You asked me about eggs. It was the first week. I didn't even know anything about what what were you talking about? Egg prices were so high you couldn't buy eggs. They didn't have any eggs. And they said Easter is going to be a disaster. Well, we had Easter at the White House and we had thousands of eggs and they were down 87%. Yeah. A lot of that of course spike was because of bird flu. But when does it become the Trump economy? Why do you say that? Well, tell me when we had the same

bird flu as he had. When does it become the Trump economy? Uh, it partially is right now, and I really mean this. I think the good parts of the Trump economy and the bad parts are the Biden economy because he's done a terrible job. He did a terrible job on everything from his autopen, which I'm sure he knew nothing about some of the things he he was supposedly signing to uh immigration. You look at what happened with immigration, how bad it was. Think of it. We have murderers, 11,888 murderers. Many of them murdered more than

one person. Think of that. And they're in our country now. We've gotten a lot of them out. And we we know who many of them are. And we're on the hunt. But why would anybody do that? Why would anybody who could do such a thing where they allow hundreds of thousands and even millions of people into our country who are criminals and uh murderers at the highest level? Who could do this? But sir, you acknowledge when you announced your tariffs, for example, the stock market dropped. It's been volatile. It has since gone up. Do you

take responsibility for that? Yeah. Do you take responsibility when it drops? Ultimately, I take responsibility for everything, but I've only just been here for a little more than 3 months. Uh, but the stock market, look at what's happened in the last short period of time. Didn't it have nine or 10 days in a row or 11 days where it's gone up and the tariffs have just started kicking in and we're we're doing really well psychologically. I mean, the fake news was giving me such press on the tariffs. The tariffs are going to make us rich.

We're going to be a very rich country. So, let's talk about the tariffs. And I want to ask you about something you said this week got a lot of attention. You were at your cabinet meeting. You said, quote, I'm going to quote what you said. Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of $30 dolls. Yeah. And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally. Are you saying that your tariffs will cause some prices to go up? No, I think your tariffs are going to be great for us

because it's going to make us rich. But you said some dolls are going to cost more. Isn't that an acknowledgement that some prices will go up? I don't think a beautiful baby girl needs that's 11 years old needs to have 30 dolls. I think they can have three dollars or four dollars. Uh because what we were doing with China was just unbelievable. We had a trade deficit of hundreds of billions of dollars with China. When you say they could have $3 instead of $30, are are you saying you're Americans could see empty storeshelves? No, I'm

No, I'm not saying that. I'm just saying they don't need to have $30. They can have three. They don't need to have 250 pencils. They can have five. But you're basically saying there could be some supply shortages because of the terror to waste money on a trade deficit with China for things we don't need for junk that we don't need. Well, prices are already going up on some popular items, tires, strollers. This is such a dishonest interview already. Prices are down on groceries. Prices are down for oil. Prices are down for oil energy. prices are

down at tremendous numbers for gasoline. And let me tell you, when you have the big thing, what he did, he spent like a stupid person, which he was, but he spent like a very stupid person. And that was bad for inflation. But what really killed us with inflation was the price of energy. It went up to $3.90, even $4. And in California, five and $6, right? Okay. I have it down to a $1.98 in many states right now. when you go that much lower on energy, which is ahead of my prediction because I really thought

I could get it down into the 250s. We have it down at a $1.98 in numerous places. But when you say costs are going up, even mortgage rates are going down. Well, but let me give you some examples. The these are I mean these are actual examples. They're go So you're saying the prices that are going down, some prices are going up. tires, strollers, some clothing in the wake of your tariff. Excuse me. That's peanuts compared to energy. Energy is 60% of the cost. But sir, you campaigned on a promise to bring prices down on

day. Well, I don't know. When you say strollers are going up, what kind of a thing? I'm saying that gasoline is going down. Gasoline is thousands of times more important than a stroller someplace. But what do you say to Americans who say they voted for you because they want and they need relief right now and they're getting it right now? What about those even mortgage rates different mortgage rates are going down despite the fact that we have a stubborn Fed. But you said dolls even dolls could cost a couple bucks more. Maybe they might but

you don't need to have as I said $35. You can have two, three, four and save a lot of money. We don't need to feed the beast. I guess you're talking about this transition cost. How long should people expect that transition to last, Mr. President? I don't I can't tell you that. I can tell you that we're making a lot of money. We're doing great. Again, we're losing more than five billion dollar a day. Five billion dollars a day. You don't talk about that. And right now, we're going to be at a point very soon

where we're making money every day. Look, how soon we were losing hundreds of billions of dollars with China. Now we're essentially not doing business with China. Therefore, we're saving hundreds of billions of dollars. Very simple. You take me to my next question, which is about China. They've been making a number of public statements, uh, very positive statements the last 24 hours. Well, and most recently, they said before talks could happen, the US would need to remove unilateral tariffs. Would you consider dropping the tariffs to get China to the negotiating table? No. They they first of

all, you're giving me a statement that was said a week ago. You're not giving the statement that was said today. I have May 2nd Chinese Commerce Ministry. Do you know what they said today? The US wants to negotiate. It should show sincerity by preparing to take actions in correcting its mistakes and canceling the unilateral tariffs. They they made n first of all, they made numerous statements. You've made how many people speak for China like 50. numerous. I can give you a statement for any occasion. Yes. But they said today they want to talk. Look, China

and I don't like this. I'm not happy about this. China's getting killed right now. They're getting absolutely destroyed. Their factories are closing. Their unemployment is going through the roof. I'm not looking to do that to China. Now, at the same time, I'm not looking to have China make hundreds of billions of dollars and build more ships and more army tanks and more airplanes. So you're not prep, just to be very clear, you're not dropping the tariffs against China to get them to the negotiating table. Those tariffs are staying on. Why would I do that? Would

you lower them? At some point, I'm going to lower them because otherwise you could never do business with them and they want to do business very much. Look, their economy is really doing badly. Their economy is collapsing. So, small businesses say they are being hurt by the Chinese tariffs and and some could be forced to shut down and many businesses are being helped. Are you concerned about tariff relief for small business? Why do you always mention that, you know, you pick up a couple of little businesses? What about the car business? They're going to make

a fortune because of the tariffs. Do you know that the union, the head of the union, who was no fan of mine, Fain, Sean Feain, I guess his name is, right? He didn't endorse me. The Teamsters did. A lot of people did. A lot of unions did. But he didn't. He couldn't stand me. Now he's saying, "Wow, what's Trump's done for the automobile?" I can't believe it. I assume he's going to probably now say the next thing he can say is, "I endorse this guy. He's the greatest I've ever seen. He can't believe it's happened."

He said, "We've been waiting 40 years for somebody to do what Trump is doing." So why don't you mention the big car industry instead of mentioning somebody that's doing strollers? Well, I'm just asking you about small businesses. Are there any discussions about giving any relief to small businesses? They're not going to need it. Okay. Are these They're going to make so much money. Are these tariffs if you build your product here? Remember, there are no tariffs if you build your product here. It's very easy. It's very simple. Are these tariffs permanent, Mr. President? Depends on

what you're talking about. one of the things that is going to bring and has brought so I think uh we probably have close to $9 trillion dollars of investments coming into this country if you look at other presidents there's never been anything like that this is over a period of two months you got to give me a little break on the one month because we're three months but you know let's say we had to get started uh we had a lot of fake news at the beginning so we had to beat that down but uh

so let's say in two months so In just a short period of time, a matter of a couple of months, we have the largest number ever in history invested in the United States and committed, we have uh between guaranteed spoken for and people that are going to make a decision and announce it pretty soon close to $9 trillion. We've never had anything close. Now, that's Apple building $500 billion worth of plants. They always built their plants in China. Now, they're building their plants over here. That's the biggest computer company, the biggest chip company in the

world. You know, the chip company from Taiwan, which is the biggest in the world, is committed for 500 billion. Another one's committed for 300 billion. We have companies, nobody's ever seen anything like it. Let me tell you the other thing very importantly, automobile companies, plant after plant after plant, Toyota, Honda, Ford, General Motors, Stalantis. I mean, nobody's ever seen anything like it. And I I don't like this, but it happens to be. They're stopping work in Mexico and they're stopping work in Canada and they're all moving here. This is important, though. You're You're not taking

the possibility that these tariffs could be permanent off the table. Some of them. Oh, I wouldn't do that because if somebody thought they were going to come off the table, why would they build in the United States? Let me ask you that. You understand that, right? Yeah. I no I mean but that's why I'm asking because there's a lot of I think uncertainty for CEOs for business owners. They want to know are these tariffs permanent? I think there's only uncertainty in the fake news. I don't think there's uncertainty. I mean I've been very rigid, very

strong on it, but I will say I have I'm flexible like with respect to parts made outside of the country. I gave the automobile companies a little extra time. You know, you're talking about 15% and then 10% of the parts made put in a car. I gave them a little extra time without penalizing them and I did that only to help, you know, companies. We're looking to help companies. We want them to thrive and to hire a lot of people and that's what's happening. Let me ask you about some of what Wall Street has said.

Some people on Wall Street have expressed concerns that the possibility of a recession is increasing and I want to know what you think about that. Are you comfortable with the country potentially dipping into a recession for a period of time if you are able to achieve your long-term goals? Well, you know, you say some people on Wall Street say, well, I tell you something else. Some people on Wall Street say that we're going to have the greatest economy in history. Why don't you talk about them? Because some people on Wall Street say this is the

That's what I'm getting at. That's what I'm getting at though. There are many people Yeah. There are many people on Wall Street say this is going to be the greatest windfall ever happened. And that's my question. long term. Is it okay in the short term to have a recession? Look, uh yeah, it's everything's okay. What we are, I said, this is a transition period. I think we're going to do fantastically. One of your colleagues on another uh fake news station, ABC said, do you guarantee 100% that a certain person is going to do a fantastic

job as let's say Secretary of Defense? Okay, cuz that was the question. I said, "What kind of a question is that? Do I guarantee 100%." Nobody guarantees 100%. But I will say this. I think we're going to have an economy the likes of which we've never had before. You know, my four years were phenomenal, as you know, the stock market. In fact, even though we had to go through the COVID thing, that horrible situation with CO, uh, we did numbers and when I gave it over, when I handed it over, the election was rigged and

I handed and because of that, we have a lot of problems, by the way. But when I handed it over, what happened? The market was higher than it was previous to just previous to CO coming in. Nobody could believe it. The stock market I'm talking about, I don't want to look back, but you you did take your case to court about that. back. You took you took your case to court about your allegations against the the election. Um, let me ask you, there's no question about the election was rigged. The facts are in and it's

still being litigated. Let's go. You did take your case to court more than 60 times and didn't win those cases. I won a lot of courtes. Just to button that up though, sir. Just to button that up. What are you talking about? The election. How worried are you? Are we talking about the election? Let's talk about here and now. Let's talk about the election of 2020. Let's not talk about Let's talk about here and now. Are you worried about a recession? No. Okay. No. No. I think we're going to have the greatest economic I mean,

do you are you worried it could happen? Do you think it could happen? Anything can happen, but I think we're going to have the greatest economy in the history of our country. I think we're going to have the greatest economic boom in history. Let me ask you about this call to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos this week in response to a report that Amazon was going to display tariff costs next to product prices. Are you going to punish CEOs who increase their prices because of tariffs? I think what I think what is a great misnomer is

the word tariff in many cases it's not to me I don't view it as a tax. I view it as an incentive for people to come into the United States and build plants, factories, offices, a lot of things. Uh I think it's an incentive but the the thing that's not known is if you look back and see oftentimes like China or Vietnam or other countries not just China because China's an abuser but there are other abusers many of them are friends of the so-called I say friend and foe and friend is oftenimes worse than foe

but what people don't understand is and this is a lot the country eats the tariff the company eats the tariff and it's not passed along at all. Well, some CEOs are saying they're going to have to pass it on. So, how do you deal with those CEOs? How do you deal with those CEOs? China is eating the tariffs, right? What do you say to those CEOs who were saying we might have to pass this on to the consumer? Well, they say that because maybe it's to their advantage to say it. Maybe punish them. No, because

you know what? I want them to build plants in the United States. That way, they don't have any tariffs. See, tariffs will and not only will look at what's happened in two months. We're close to $9 trillion of investment. We've never been anywhere near that. What did you say to Jeff Bezos? He's just a very nice guy. We have a relationship. I asked him about it. He said, "Well, I don't want to do that." And he took it off immediately. So, he changed course. And will you take that same tactic with other CEOs if you

call people if I disagree with them? If I if I think that somebody's doing something that's incorrect, wrong, or maybe hurtful to the country, I'll call. Absolutely. Wouldn't you want me to call? Biden wouldn't call because he didn't know what was happening. But I do. Takes me to my next question. Uh today's strong jobs report likely means, not clear, but likely means the Fed uh is less likely to lower interest rates. Well, he should lower them, and uh at some point he will. He'd rather not because he's not a fan of mine. not, you know,

he just doesn't like me because I think he's a total stiff and uh, you know, it's just one of those things. He should lower them. And I wish the people that uh are on that board would get him to lower because we are at a perfect time. It's already late, but he should lower interest rates. Do you rule out removing Fed Chair Jerome Pal? I'm not, you know, I get to change him very quickly anyway. You know, it's in a very short period of time in 2026. You're not gonna remove You don't have plans to

remove him before 2026 when his time's up. That was a total Why would I do that? I get to replace the person in another short period of time. Okay. Uh this week you reshuffled your national security team. You moved national security adviser Mike Waltz to UN ambassador. Just to remind our viewers, Waltz of course started that uh unsecure text chain where sensitive information was shared. Mr. President, was that move a punishment? No, I just think he'll do a nice job uh in the new position. Marco's doing an outstanding job. No, Marco won't keep Marco's very

busy doing other things, so he's not going to keep it long term. We're going to put somebody else in. But I think Mike, who's a, as you know, he's a fine guy, and I think he'll do a very good job. Knows the countries, knows leadership, and I think he'll do a very good job at the United Nations. And in the meantime, Marco's really doing something special, and uh it's going to work out very well. We're hearing some potential names. Steven Miller's name, one of your longtime most loyal aids. His name uh has been talked about

as a potential national security adviser. Is he someone you're looking at? Well, I'd love to have Stephen there, but that would be a downgrade. Steven's very Steven is much higher in the totem pole than that in my opinion. Can you tell us who the front runner is right now? Well, I have a lot of people that want it. I will tell you, I have everybody calling. Everybody wants to be a part of this administration. So, at some point we'll, you know, probably do that. Uh, you know, there's a theory, Henry Kissinger did both. There's a

theory that you don't need two people. But I think I have some really great people that could do a good job. So, Secretary Rubio could continue to have both jobs indefinitely. He could. Yeah, he could. But I I think he even would like to probably see because it is a little bit different. But in the meantime, he'll handle it. And I think Mike, if if that goes forward, you know, that he he still has to get approved. But I think Mike will do a very good job at the United Nations. Defense Secretary Pete Hexath obviously

also on that unsecure text chain. He was sharing uh sensitive information. Are you looking for a new Secretary of Defense? No, not even a little bit. No. Pete's going to be great. We're His job is safe right now. Doing a fantastic job against the Houthies who like blowing ships up and watching them sink in the ocean. Uh we're hitting them very hard. No, he's doing a very good job. His job is safe right now. Totally safe. Okay, let's talk about the border. Uh, let's talk about deportations. Border crossings are at their lowest level ever recorded.

Is the border? Is the border now secure? Yeah, it's really secure. It's absolutely good that when you say that, doesn't that just sound good? after being abused for years by an incompetent president that allowed people to pour through an open border, criminals from all over the world, murderers and insane people from mental institutions and insane asylums. Isn't it Isn't it a beautiful thing when you say it's the most secure it's ever been in the history of our country? Isn't that a nice statement? Well, I'm I'm curious to know what it means. You declared a national

emergency on the southern border. The order is still in place even though you're saying what you said, you know, means we have the most secure border we've ever had. Well, and I guess the question becomes when will you know that the emergency is over? Are you planning to lift it at some point? Is it necessary? Because obviously the military is involved. Will you lift that that emergency? Well, the biggest emergency is the courts aren't allowing us to take really We're going to talk about that, but talk to me first about the emergency. Talk to me

first about this. The border is not the emergency. the border is is uh it's all part of the same thing though. The big emergency right now is that we have thousands of people that we want to take out and we have some judges that want everybody to go to some of them you appointed sir including three on the Supreme Court. They change. I mean it's uh it's unbelievable. It's unbelievable how that happens but they do change. Just to button this up though. Are you planning to lift that emergency order anytime soon now that the border

secure? We have an emergency. We have a massive emergency overall. It's an overall emergency on immigration. And uh the if the courts don't allow us to take people out, if we had to have a court case, every single think of it, every single person, we have millions of people. We're going to have millions of court cases. Figure two weeks of court case. It would be 300 years. So let's talk about this because uh obviously you've had a back and forth with the Supreme Court in a 9 to zero decision. The Supreme Court directed your administration

to facilitate the return, you've talked about this in the past, of Kilmargo Garcia uh from a prison in El Salvador whose deportation your administration called an administrative error. You said in a recent interview you could bring him back, but you won't. Are you defying the Supreme Court? No, I'm relying on the attorney general of the United States, Pam Bond, who's very capable doing a great job because I'm not involved in the legality or the illegality. I've have lawyers to do that and that's why I have a great DOJ. We have a great one. We had

a very corrupt one before. Now we have a great one. And they're not viewing the decision the way you said it. They don't view it that way at all. They think it's a totally different decision. Well, you say you have the power to bring him back, though. Your attorney general says, quote, "That's up to Al Salvador." Just to put a fine point on this, do you have the power to bring Abrego Garcia back as the Supreme Court? Well, I have the power to ask for him to come back if I'm instructed by the attorney general

that it's legal to do so, but the decision as to whether or not he should come back will be the head of El Salvador is a very capable man. Well, you know, and your attorney general has said it the issue is with that word facilitate. Will you seek clarification from the Supreme Court? Do you need to go back to the Supreme Court? We may do that. I was asking about that. We may do that. There are some people that say bring him back, put him in trial and you get him out right away because you

take you see what happened just this morning. Tapes came out, horrible tapes from his wife. You don't get much worse than that. You don't get I mean, he seems certainly like a very dangerous, very bad person. But even the wife who uh was so afraid, she was afraid to talk and all of a sudden tapes got released this morning that were devastating to him. And this is the point, sir, and about due process. The Constitution says every person, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Why not push to have him come back, present all of that

evidence in court, let a judge decide? Well, I'll leave that to the lawyers and I'll leave that to the attorney general of the United States because they're you have to understand, I'm dealing with Russia and Ukraine. I'm dealing with that. I'm dealing with Iran. I'm dealing with Rwanda and the Congo who are fighting and we're trying to get that one straightened out and I think we have done that. Did a great job. Nobody even talks about it, but I think we're close to doing that. Uh they're looking like they're going to maybe make a peace

deal, which was would be good. But I'm dealing with a lot of different things. Uh I don't know much about this gentleman other than I hear he's an absolute not good person and I have very capable legal people John Sauer as you know and all top people and I have to rely on that to interpret whatever said by the Supreme Court. Now with that being said I have tremendous respect for the Supreme Court. Look, three of the people are people I appointed, right? And I have great respect for the Supreme Court, and I would expect

that the attorney general will be doing the right thing. Do your secretary of state says everyone who's here, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Do you agree, Mr. President? I don't know. I'm not I'm not a lawyer. I don't know. Well, the fifth amendment says I don't know. It seems It seems It might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or two million or three million trials. We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on earth. Some

of the worst, most dangerous people on earth. And I was elected to get them the hell out of here and the courts are holding me from doing it. But even given those numbers that you're talking about, don't you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president? I don't know. Uh, I have to respond by saying again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said is not what I heard. The Supreme Court said they have a different interpretation. Is

anyone in your administration right now in contact with El Salvador about returning Abrego Garcia to I don't know. You'd have to ask the attorney general that question. Okay. At least two Americans have been mistakenly detained and released by your uh administration immigration authorities. Mr. President, should lawful residents of this country start carrying paperwork with them when they leave their homes? I don't think that'll be necessary. But uh what you're not saying is that many people have been killed, maimed, badly hurt by illegal immigrants that came over that are from prisons and from jails and from

uh mental institutions and they're hurting our people. And if we don't get them out, we're not going to have a country for long. We need honest Yeah. We need honest media and we need walls. We need to have borders. And by the way, I built a lot of walls and if we didn't do that, we wouldn't be able to have those. You know, we would not be able to have the kind of numbers if I wasn't successful in building hundreds of miles of wall. Very quickly, sir, the last time you and I spoke in December,

you said that you would consider working on getting dreamers legal status. Dreamers, of course, those who are brought here illegally as children. Where do those efforts stand? Is that a priority for you? Well, it's not a priority for the Democrats because every time we talk about it, they don't want to talk about it because I guess they like it as a political issue, but they're not good at political issues because they still want to have men playing women's sports. Well, Republicans do control Congress right now, Mr. President, but dreamers a priority. Well, you you need

for that you would need to have support from Democrats and we have no support from the Democrat. Have you had any discussions about dreamers? Yeah, we've had discussions. I we would do something. I'd love to put in beautiful immigration for everybody, but the Democrats don't want to approve anything. All they want to do is knock out a tax bill. We're trying to get approved right now the biggest tax cut in the history of our country. And if it doesn't get approved, it's a 68% tax increase, and that's what the Democrats want. They want a 68%

tax increase. It's rather incredible. Um, and I do want to talk to you about your legislation, but let's talk about Doge very quickly. Doge has fired and then rehired thousands of federal workers, including FAA employees in charge of aviation safety, specialists working on nuclear weapon safety. What do you say to those who believe Elon Musk's chainsaw approach has jeopardized the safety and security of Americans? Well, he found 160 billion dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse. I mean, I think he's done an amazing job. I think his people have done an incredible job. They're brilliant

people. They know the computer. I actually asked him, "What's their big trait?" He said, "They're unbelievable at computers." In other words, you can't fake them out because these people were in many cases crooks. But it was fraud, waste, and abuse. They found your question should be asked a different way. Uh were certain things found. Yes. How much? $160 billion. Think of what 160 billion is. He found 160. He said he'd find two trillion. Well, we're not finished yet. Mhm. We're not finished yet. Do you think the work continues? Even though he's leaving, he said, "Sure."

He's leaving behind some very brilliant people. They were on television last night. They're super high IQ people. I like high IQ people. The Democrats don't have many of them. Let me ask you about some news that broke. Uh you are threatening to rescend Harvard's taxexempt status. Uh, and yet directing the IRS to investigate and rescend a university's taxexempt status is contrary to what's in the federal law. The law says you can't do this. Do you think you're following the law? Well, I tell you, I'm going to just follow what the lawyers say. They say that

we're allowed to do that, and I'm all for it, but everything I say is subject to the laws being 100% adhered to. Are you going to willing to take this to court? If it becomes a court fight, you're going to you're going to take it that far? won a lot of cases. All right, let's talk about some of the other actions you've taken over the past 100 days. Last month, you directed your attorney general, Pam Bondi, to review two people who you perceive to be your political adversaries. And yet, you told me in December that

you would not direct the Justice Department to investigate your political foes. What changed? Well, no. I just uh look at people and I'm not directing anybody. They looked at these two people. uh they might have known it or they might have heard it from two years ago. One person said he knew me so well. He was I think on CNN or MSDNC, but they're both failing networks. You're happy to know even though one of them I guess is related to you in one form or another, although they're trying to cut him loose as fast as

possible. But uh the it was well known that this one person, it was almost like he was my brother. I don't even know who he is. Maybe he was there. Maybe he was in the Oval Office a few times as a surrogate for, you know, somebody in some form of government along with 25 other people that sat in the back of the room or stood in the back of a room. I have no idea who this guy is. And he's out there and then he did a book called Anonymous. Did a book called Anonymous. I

think that's really subversion. I think it's I think it's spying. It's something. It's something really bad. Well, you passed executive order calling for attorney general for a long time and the other one said that the election was so wonderful. It was such a well, it turned out it wasn't a wonderful election. It was a corrupt election. Let me ask it this way, sir, cuz when when we talked in December, I asked you, what is your message to people who didn't vote for you? Let me remind you of what you said. You said, "I love you,

and we're going to all work together." How does pursuing your political foes help to Did I say I love you? You really did. That's a direct quote. Yeah, I'm sure you're right, but I'd like to see I promise I'll show it to you. I'll show you the tape. Look, um, how does that help to unify the country? Treat people fairly whether they voted for me or not. I want to have a unified country. It's very hard because the media is so fake, including like even the way you ask questions. Every question is asked in a

negative vein. Uh, there's a toy company that took a toddler's, you know, whatever. Uh, and but you don't talk about the fact that gasoline is down at at numbers that nobody believes possible. You know why they're down, by the way? Drill, baby, drill. We're drilling like crazy right now. We try to make sure every question is fair, Mr. President. Look, every question you ask says a very negative slant. No, no, but I'm just I'm fine for responding to you. I don't think you're very difficult at all to respond to, to be honest with you. But

you know what? You should ask some positive things. Like, sir, it's amazing what you've done with gasoline because you know what? Gasoline's big business. A stroller is not big business. To this question, Mr. President, you said you wanted to unify the country. Does going after political foes undercut that goal? No, not at all. No, we want honest people. Okay. I think you have to do that. We want honest people in this country. Let me ask you big picture. people who have lived in countries like the Philippines, Hungary, Russia. They look at some of your actions

going after civil service, going after universities, law firms, the media. They say it's out of an authoritarian playbook. What do you say to those who believe you are taking the country down an authoritarian path? Well, there you go again. Why don't you ask it a different way? Many people wanted to come into our country. Many people love Trump. I won the election. They didn't win the election. I got a lot more votes than they did. I got I won the popular vote. I won all seven swing states by a lot. A lot of people were

surprised. I said, I think you could win four, maybe five. No, I won all seven and I won by a lot and I won. Actually, I think there was a lot of hanky panky going on, but it was too big to rig. That's the good news. It's too big to rig. But let me just say so when you make these statements about people say this people well you know they had their chance at the election and they lost big. So you should ask the question differently. You should say what about the people that want to

be in this country? What about the people that love this country? But what do you say to I'm asking it on behalf of those people to give you a chance to respond to them. What do you say to those people sir? Those people are going to be very happy. They're going to have to see some results and I think we had a great 100 days. There are a lot of people that say it was unprecedented. It was an absolutely unprecedented 100 days and I hope that they're going to be right. Do you see disscent as

an essential part of democracy? It's a part of democracy. It is. You're always an important part of democracy. Yeah, you're always going to have Kristen. You're always going to have disscent. Uh there's nothing you're going to do about that. It's am I going to get a 100% unified? It would be a strange place. I don't I can't even imagine it where 100% look, you have people that are good people. They're very smart people and they honestly believe we should have open borders and the entire world should be allowed to pour into our country. I think

it's a 955 issue, but they they believe it. They're not even bad people. Some of them are bad. You have people that honestly believe that men should be allowed to play in women's sports. Some of these people I really actually I don't know any. I haven't been able to find any, but they exist. They say it's an 8020 issue. I don't believe that. I think it's a 97 to3 issue. Do you think people should have the right to criticize you without fear of reprisal? Absolutely. Yeah, I do. That I do. And how do you square

that? I think that happens. How do you square that with the fact that you have passed these executive orders asking the attorney general to look into some of the people who have criticized you, who've been harshest against I have been investigated more than any person in the history of the United States of America. I've been investigated more than the late great, as I say at my rallies, Alons Capone. Alons Capone was a nasty man. He was a the highest level gangster and I have been investigated more than Al Capone, more than anybody. Uh these people

are evil people and I won. And I'll tell you what, all I want to happen is for the Department of Justice and the FBI. Pam is great and Cash is great. I think they're two great people, but they're their own people. They want to do a fantastic job. And all I want to do and all I want to ask for is that they be allowed to do their job. I'm not telling them to do anything and I believe I have the right to do it. I'm in theory the top law enforcement officer as the president.

We went over this once before and it turned out I was right. But I'm not looking to use that. We have two great people and we have many, many incredible people under them and I just want them to do their job and do it well. Let me ask you about something I don't think you've been asked much about, which is uh you've branded your own uh crypto cryptocurrency. The coin's values actually surged recently after you announced that top holders would be invited to have dinner. I don't even know that. What did it What did it

surged to? Yeah. What's it worth? You might as well tell me because I have no idea. Well, it it surged. It surged. I will find it. Hold on one second. 5.2 or 58%. So 58% to what number? That's not bad. 14.32. What? Billion? No. Dollars per cryptocurrency. Billion dollars. No. What's the number? I mean, what is the amount? The memecoin's value hit a peak of 7535 on January 19th. But that doesn't mean anything. And that's before your inauguration and then it surged. Look, I'm in favor of crypto. Let me Okay, but let me just ask

you, what do you say to those who argue that when they hear that they worry you're profiting from the presidency? I'm not profiting from anything. I'm just all I'm doing is, you know, be this I started this long before the election. Uh I want crypto. I think crypto is important because if we don't do it, China's going to and it's new. It's very popular. It's very hot. If you look at the market, when the market went down, that stayed much stronger than other aspects of the market. But I want crypto because a lot of people,

you know, millions of people want it. I don't know if you know that Biden went after it violently. And then before the election, he changed his tune entirely. His head of the SEC, everybody changed their tune. You know why? Because there were hundreds of millions of people that are participating in crypto and they wanted to get their votes. But you're not you're not profiting off of the cryptocurrency. I haven't even looked. I'll tell you what. Look, if I own stock and something and I do a good job and the stock market goes up, I guess

I'm profiting. But who really profits is somebody like Nancy Pelosi who uses inside information. She she worked for $175,000 a year and that's at the high end and she's worth $150 million. Okay? You ought to look at Nancy Pelosi and you ought to look at some of these politicians that are stone cold crooks. I was very wealthy when I came in. Uh being president, I probably cost me money if you really look. In fact, uh I do something that no other president has done. They think maybe George Washington has done. I contribute my entire salary

to the government. Back to the government. Will you contribute anything you earn from crypto back to the government if that happened? I never thought of that. I mean, uh, should I contribute all of my real estate that I've owned for many years if it goes up a little bit because I'm president and doing a good job? I don't think so. Okay. But I've, uh, I've done something that surprisingly they say nobody else has done, no other president has done. I've give and it's a substantial salary. It's like a half a million dollars a year or

$550,000 a year, four years, couple of million dollars. Uh, I gave it to the government last time. I never got a story saying I gave it. Nobody cared if I gave it. I guarantee if I didn't give it, that'd be a big story. But no other president, they say, with the possible exception of George Washington, and they have been able to find those records. And we've had wealthy presidents before, but no other president has contributed the salary. And they told me before this that you will probably be asking me whether or not I'm going to

contribute my salary again, but you haven't asked that. Are you going to? Yes, you are. Okay. Yes, I am. Okay. Um, well, I appreciate we just made news there. Let's talk about foreign policy, sir. You just signed a minerals deal with Ukraine. Uh, it's a sign, it seems, that the United States is invested in Ukraine's future. The Secretary of State told me this is a very critical week. Are you any closer to reaching a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia? I hope so. Uh I do believe we're closer with one party and maybe not as

close with the other, but we'll have to see. I'd like to not say which one we're closer to, but we did do a deal for the American people that was good, but we're able to get rare earth. You know, the Europeans are getting paid back. They have a loan. We didn't. Biden just gave him $350 billion. He has no idea where the money is, what happened. And at least we'll in one form or another get our I don't feel so foolish. And remember this, this is Biden's war. This was a war that was never going

to happen if I were president. This is a a horrible, horrible war. And I get to see shots of soldiers through, you know, satellite that are so just so terrible. 5,000 soldiers are being Look, 5,000 soldiers a week on average are dying. They're not American soldiers, but I want to solve the problem. They're Russian soldiers and they're Ukrainian soldiers. And if I can save 5,000 souls, I just love doing it. How long do you give both countries before you're going to walk away? Well, there'll be a time when I will say, "Okay, keep going. Keep

being stupid." When does that come? Uh, are we are you close to it? Sometimes I get close to it and then positive things happen. Okay. So, I uh I hope it gets done. Your close ally, Senator Lindsey Graham, has a sanctions bill against Russia. If you get to that point, Mr. President, where you're prepared to walk away, will you support will you sign that sanctions bill? Well, it depends on whether or not Russia is behaving toward coming to a peace. We want a peace deal. We want Russia and Ukraine to agree to a deal. We

think we're fairly close. And we're going to save a lot of people from being killed. We save a lot of money, too, because we're spending money like, you know, Europe is spending a third of the money that we're spending. And it's more important for Europe than it is for us. Biden had no control. He just sent money over there willy-nilly. Nobody had any idea what was happening, why they were doing it, why they were sending it. And it was massive amounts of money. So you think you're close to a deal? What will Russia have to

give up? Because Ukraine, there's been discussions they will have to give up some of the land. Russia would have to give up all of Ukraine because that's what they want. All of Ukraine, meaning they wouldn't keep any of the land that they've claimed. Russia would have to give up all of Ukraine because what Russia wants is all of Ukraine. And if I didn't get involved, they would be fighting right now for all of Ukraine. Russia doesn't want the strip that they have now. Russia wants all of Ukraine. And if it weren't me, they would keep

going. Do you know that the European Union leaders have asked me to call Putin so many times because he doesn't return their phone call? You you posted on social media he might be tapping you along. Might be. Did you misread? But you might be tapping me along too when you tell me how nice and into you this is going to be. So did you you know I'm used to being tapped along. Did you in any way misread Vladimir Putin? Did I what? Misread him now that you're saying that? Well, I I'll tell you about that

in uh a month from now or two weeks from now. I have no idea. I can tell you this. Uh he's his ambition was stopped to a large extent when he saw that it was me that was now leading the charge because he wasn't dealing with anybody in Europe. He wasn't calling him back. Do you know that I asked him I said did Biden never call you in three years? Did Biden never call? He said he never called. You know Biden didn't call him one time and all these thousands of soldiers hundreds millions of soldiers

are dying and people not only soldiers people dying in the cities and the towns and the whole heritage of that c country is being blown apart. I mean the country's heritage is being blown apart. You know the steeples, those beautiful spires that you see, you know the most beautiful in the world. Yeah. Almost 95% of them are laying in smitherreens all broken up and so sad laying all over the ground because they were shot. It's it's really a bad situation. And he didn't get one phone call from Biden. The war would have never started. And

and by the way, for four years it didn't start. I was there for four years. It was the apple of his eye. This was the apple of Putin's eye. There was no chance he would have gone in. What's the red line for you? At what point do you say that's it, we're walking away? Well, you'll know. I mean, there'll be a time when I may say that and if I there may be something I can't maybe it's not possible to do. There's tremendous hatred. Just so you understand, Kristen, we're talking tremendous hatred between these two

men and between, you know, some of the soldiers, frankly, between the generals. They've been fighting hard for three years. Um, I think we have a very good chance of doing it. Very quickly, if you do walk away, would that mean that you would pull military and intelligence? I don't want to say that now. It's too early to say that. I don't want to get into that argument. Let's move on to Canada. Uh you have long talked about making Canada the 51st state. There's obviously a new prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney, who you spoke to

after his victory. He says that you didn't talk to him in that call about making Canada a 51st. No, he called me. He was very nice and I congratulated him. He had a victory. It's a very close victory. It's, you know, there's no majority or anything. So, that's going to make things a little bit difficult, I think, for him to run. But, uh, he nevertheless had a victory. And he's a very nice man, I think. Do you plan to talk to him about making Canada? He wants to come and see me. He's going to come

this week or next week. So, will you talk to him about making Canada a 51st state annex in Canada? I'll always talk about that. You know why? We subsidize Canada to the tune of $200 billion dollars a year. We don't need their cars. In fact, we don't want their cars. We don't need their energy. We don't even want their energy. We have more than they do. We don't want their lumber. We have great lumber. All I have to do is free it up from the environmental lunatics. We don't need anything that they have. We're giving

them I asked I asked Mr. Trudeau, who I call Governor Trudeau, I said, you know, not Prime Minister, Governor. I said, Governor Trudeau, could I ask you one question? Why are we giving you 200 billion? Why are we subsidizing Canada? If Canada was a state, it wouldn't cost us. It would be great. It would be such a great We It would be a cherished state. And if you look at our map, if you look at the geography, I'm a real estate guy at heart. When I look down at that, without that artificial line that was

drawn with a ruler many years ago, was just an artificial line goes straight across. You don't even realize what a beautiful country it would be. It would be great. But I I don't think the American public wants me to pay $200 billion dollar a year to subsidize Canada. Again, remember this. Yeah. We don't need their cars. We don't need their labor. We don't need their energy. We don't need anything. We do very little business with Canada. They do all of their business practically with us. You They need us. We don't need them. You and I

talked and I asked you if you would rule out military force to take Greenland and you said no, you don't rule out anything. Would you rule out military force to take Canada? Well, I I think we're not going to ever get to that point. It could happen. Something could happen with Greenland. I'll be honest. We need that for uh national and international security. I think it's highly unlikely. I don't see it with Canada. I just don't see it. I have to be honest with you. Okay. But you don't rule it out for Greenland. And and

by the way, Canada, they spend less money on military than practically any nation in the world. They pay NATO less than any nation. They they think we're subsidi they think we are going to protect them and really we are but the truth is they don't carry their full share and it's unfair to the United States and our taxpayers and you are not ruling out military force to to take Greenland. I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it but I don't rule out anything. No, not there. We need that. We need

Greenland very badly. Greenland is a very small amount of people which we'll take care of and we'll cherish them and all of that. But we need that for international security. Do you know we have Russian boats and we have Chinese boats, gunships all over the place, aircraft carriers, gunships going up and down the coast of Greenland. We we need that to be protected internationally. We need it. So you are willing to send US troops to claim a sovereign territory? I didn't say that. You asked me a question. Would you? Is there a circumstance? It could

happen. I doubt it will, but it certainly could happen with respect to Greenland. Okay. Let me ask you about Iran. Uh your administration has had conversations uh with Iran. Is the goal of these talks limiting Iran's nuclear program or total dismantlement? Total dismantlement. That's all you'll accept? That's all I'd accept. Now there's a new theory going out there that Iran would be allowed to have civilian meaning to make electricity and to but I say you know they have so much oil what do they need it for? But you know I've seen it with other states

where they're looking to do something and they have a lot of oil. Iran has tremendous energy. You know I put sanctions if you know that I put uh pretty strong sanctions on two days ago on the oil. The sad part is that if Biden didn't get involved, if we had a competent president, you would have never had the attack on Israel. October 7th would have never taken place. Hamas would have had no money because Iran was broke. And now in a period of four years during the Biden administration, they became very rich. They have over

300 billion dollars cash in the bank. And uh they had no money. They were ready to make a deal with me. And it's very sad because of this rigged election. They didn't do it. just another thing you can mark down to a bad election. It's interesting what you're saying though because Secretary Rubio uh has said that he would accept or the idea is there is an openness to accepting peaceful civil nuclear programs. Well, that's what people I didn't say anything contradictory. I said that people are talking about that and this is something that's really pretty

new in the dialogue and I'd have to be uh you know my inclination is to say what do you need that for? you have a lot of oil. So you want total dismantlement. Bottom line, I think that it I would be open to hearing it. You know, civilian energy it's called. But you know, civilian energy often needs to leads to military wars and we don't want to have them have a nuclear weapon. It's a very simple deal. I want Iran to be really successful, really great, really fantastic. The only thing they can't have is a

nuclear weapon. Okay. Um if they want to be successful, that's okay. I want them to be so successful and you know the Iranian people are incredible. I just don't want them to have a nuclear weapon because the world will be destroyed. Just to recap, we're talking about your desire to claim Canada, Greenland. What do you say to people? You forgot the Panama Canal. Panama Canal. What do you say to people who say they voted for you because they wanted you to end foreign conflicts, not start new? I don't see that as conflict. I I think

that's good for our country, those things. Look, the Panama Canal was taken over by China effectively. Now, China seems to have left. But the Panama Canal, think of this deal. We built the most expensive object we've ever built in the history of our country. That was Mount McKinley. They just took away. I just gave him back the name. But McKinley made the money. Teddy Roosevelt spent the money. McKinley takes very little credit, you know, but he made, you know, how he made the money through tariffs. He was the big tariff president. Okay, but forget that.

We built the Panama Canal. It was the most expensive thing. It would be the equivalent like almost $2 trillion today. We've never spent it and it was very successful and Jimmy Carter gave it away for $1. Panama insisted Panama says they do control the canal. But we have a couple more questions left and I Panama said little rap. Panama said what? Panama says they still control it. I know you're you're saying China. Panama says they still control it. You know, if you would have gone there about 5.2 months ago, Yeah. every single sign on the

Panama Canal, with the exception of about 15% of them was in Chinese. Let me ask you because we're nearing the end. Just a couple more questions here. I'm not complaining. You keep saying to me like I'm rushing. No, you're not. And I really appreciate it. I really appreciate. I don't want to make you nervous. Thank you. The Trump Organization is selling hats that say Trump 2028. Yeah. Are you seriously considering a third term, Mr. President, even though it's prohibited by the Constitution? Or is this about staying politically viable? I will say this. So many people

want me to do it. I have never had requests so strong as that. But it's something that to the best of my knowledge, you're not allowed to do. Mhm. I don't know if that's constitutional that they're not allowing you to do it or anything else, but there are many people selling the 2028 hat, but this is not something I'm looking to do. I'm looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward. But I think we're going to have four years and I

think four years is plenty of time to do something really spectacular. The Constitution does prohibit it. Have you some of your allies are pretty serious about this though, Mr. President. I've spoken to them. They say they are coming up with potential ways. Obviously, the biggest one would be a constitutional amendment. That's because they like the job I'm doing and it's a compliment. It's really a great compliment. Has anyone approached you though with an actual plan, a way to actually start the process? Well, there are ways of doing amendment. There are ways of doing it and

you know the same thing and uh if you look at uh the vice presidential thing and you hear different concepts and different other people say you can have a right in vote. There's lots of different things. With all of that being said, I want to be a great president. I will have served. Hopefully uh everything will go well. I feel very good. I just did a physical. I took unlike all other presidents, I took cognitive tests and I aced it. I got 100% correct. And the doctor, one doctor said, there were numerous doctors watching and

he said, "I've never seen that before." Um, Biden didn't take a cognitive. He couldn't have gotten the first question right, but I came out great with a physical both physically and mentally. And uh, I just want to serve, do a great job. I'll be an eight-year president. I'll be a two-term president. I always thought that was very important to be honest with you. You know, if you look at President Pulk, he was a one-termer and he did some great things. Actually, pretty good president. Uh, and I'm not saying uh you can't do that, but there's

something about being a two-term president that was very important to me. And just to put a button on it, has anyone in an official capacity presented you with, sir, here are some ideas by which you could actually get a constitution? capacity of being a big supporter of many people have said different things but I'm not looking at that you haven't had official meetings about it no and and just so you understand four years is a long time I have almost four years we you know all of these things that we've done we've done more than

any president and even you might admit that nobody's done the extent of of the things that we've done nobody's done this in essentially a little bit more than three months as they say 100 days uh I'm looking to do a great job as president and set the country on the right track because if I didn't win this country would have failed. We would have been a failed nation. You have built a political movement that has transformed the Republican party. It's transformed the country political movement in history. MAGA when you make America great again. When you

look to the future, Mr. President, do you think the MAGA movement can survive without you as its leader? Yes, I do. What gives you I think it's so strong and I think we have tremendous people. I think we have a tremendous group of people. We talked about a number of them. Uh you look at Marco, you look at JD Vance who's fantastic. You look at I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here. No, I think we have a tremendous party. And you know what I can't name? I can't name one Democrat.

I mean, I look at the Democrats. They're in total disarray. They have a new person named Crockett. I watched her speak the other day. It's she's definitely a low IQ person. Uh and they said she's the future of the party. I said, "You have to be kidding. I don't know what they're going to do." And I really believe in a two-party system. I because it's good to be challenged. It's really good to have a two-party. You know, it's good. You being challenged is okay. It keeps you sharp. I don't know what they're going to do.

They have nobody. Bernie's 87 years old or something. And you know, Biden is the worst thing that ever happened to old people because he was grossly incompetent. And I think maybe for artificial reasons, you know, he had operations and things. So maybe that's an artificial, but I know people that are unbelievably sharp and they're older than 87. But I watch Bernie Sanders. He's a nut job, but he's still sharp. He's sharp as he's the same guy he was. He hasn't gone down. But Biden is really he's the worst thing to happen to old people. I

know that you are only a 100 days in. But as we sit here today, who do you see as your successor, Mr. President? Well, I it's far too early to say that, but I, you know, I do have a vice president and typically would be and JD is doing a fantastic job. He would be at the top of the list. It could very well be. I I don't want to get involved in that. I think he's a fantastic, brilliant guy. Uh Marco is great. There's a lot of them that are great. Uh I I also

see tremendous unity, but certainly you would say that somebody's the VP. If that person is outstanding, I guess that person would have an advantage, but I think the other people would all stay in unbelievably high positions, but uh you know, it could be that he'd be challenged by somebody. We have a lot of good people in this party. Thanks for watching. Stay updated about breaking news and top stories on the NBC News app or follow us on social media.