Wife Murdered in Cold Blood In Her Bedroom, Child Just Steps Away! True Crime Documentary.

on the evening of April 26th 2005 in Durham North Carolina Janet abaroa a pregnant mother was found dead in her home with her six-year-old Kaden sleeping in the Next Room the investigation revealed a tangled web of Deceit infidelity and financial struggles as police delved into the case they uncovered troubling inconsistencies in her husband Raven's story accusations of embezzlement and a suspicious life insurance policy added layers to an already complex narrative what really happened on that fateful Night Janet aboa was born on June 19th 1979 in Virginia as the seventh of 10 children in a devout

Mormon family she was intelligent and athletic so she distinguished herself from an early age she excelled in sports like soccer basketball and swimming her hard work in academics and Athletics put her on the first women's soccer team at South Virginia University in 198 8 during her time at the University Janet met Raven abaroa he was a player on the men's soccer team and presented himself as a charismatic Suitor who shared her religious beliefs their relationship developed rapidly and they became Inseparable by August 2000 at just 20 years old Janet married Raven in a ceremony that

adhered to their religious Traditions after their marriage the couple moved to Durham North Carolina for job opportunities with Eurosport initially the they appeared to be a perfect couple however signs of trouble began to emerge as Financial strains and infidelity issues surfaced in their relationship the marriage between Janet and Raven abaroa began to deteriorate in 2003 when Raven confessed to multiple Affairs this admission included a relationship with a minor which not only shattered Janet's trust but also introduced significant strains into their already fragile relationship following this Revelation Revan temporarily moved moved out leaving Janet to confront

the emotional turmoil alone the couple's issues were compounded when Janet discovered she was pregnant with their second child in 2005 this unexpected news created a profound dilemma for her she was torn between her commitment to her marriage and the reality of Raven's infidelity in December 2004 Raven abaroa was arrested for shoplifting at the sporting goods stores where both he and Janet were employed during the investigation it was revealed that he had been engaged engaged in a scheme to embezzle goods worth over $9,000 from the store Raven operated his embezzlement scheme methodically he ordered athletic shoes

and arranged for their delivery to their home address after receiving the merchandise he sold the shoes online under the Alias footballer guy this approach allowed him to profit from stolen goods while maintaining an appearance of legitimacy the embezzlement came to light when the supplier contacted the sporting goods store regarding unpaid merchandise a verification of delivery address quickly LED investigators to Raven resulting in his prompt dismissal from the store in subsequent legal action although Janet was not involved in the thefts she faced significant shame and humiliation due to her husband's actions leading her to leave her

job as well Raven managed to avoid prison time for his embezzlement instead he was sentenced to 2 years of Probation and ordered to pay restitution of nearly $10,000 the financial strain from Raven's embezzlement and subsequent legal troubles added immense pressure on the young family who were already struggling to make ends meet they had received support from their landlord and Church community but Raven's actions exacerbated their dire financial situation as tensions escalated Raven took out a life insurance policy on Janet worth $500,000 which raised suspicions about his intentions this decision seemed particularly questionable given their precarious

financial situation and the fact that he had not previously held such policies Janet increasingly expressed ESS concerns about Raven's aggressive behavior towards her friends fearing his unpredictable outbursts of anger these factors infidelity Financial instability and escalating tensions set the stage for the tragedy that was about to unfold the combination of personal and financial crises created an environment ripe for conflict ultimately leading to the catastrophic events of April 26th 2005 on April 26th 2005 the day began like any other for janed aboa she picked up her six-month-old son Kaden from daycare and returned home the couple

had plans to meet with a member of their Church community later that evening as the day progressed tensions within the household were palpable stemming from ongoing marital issues around 8:30 p.m. Raven aboa prepared to leave for a soccer match in Morrisville in an unusual move he locked their two dogs in the shed before departing this Behavior was out of character as the dogss typically slept indoors and provided Jan with a sense of security when questioned later this action raised suspicions among investigators Raven claimed that when he left the house Janet was getting ready for bed

however around 10: p.m. he returned home to find her dead on the floor in an unnatural position initially he reported to the 911 dispatcher that she had suffered a gunshot wound however it was later determined that she had been stabbed multiple times when investigators arrived at the aboa residence on April 26 2005 they found found Janet aboa in a kneeling position on the floor of their bedroom the scene was Grim with evidence indicating that she had been brutally attacked an autopsy later confirmed the Janet had suffered multiple stab wounds specifically she had three deep stab

wounds on her left arm which was identified as a defensive wound and two fatal stab wounds to her chest and neck the Fatal stab wounds severed an artery and penetrated her lung leading to her death the coroner also confirmed the Janet was was pregnant at the time of her murder a fact known only to a few of her closest friends there were no signs of a struggle or a forced entry at the crime scene and valuables remained untouched only Raven's laptop and several kitchen knives were missing from the house Janet's wedding ring and other jewelry

were found untouched on her vanity suggesting that the victim likely knew her as salent or willingly let them into her home crucial evidence collected at the crime scene included a bloody shoe print and a fingerprint that did not match Ravens these findings raised significant questions about Raven's claims and the circumstances surrounding Janet's death Raven eo's frantic call reporting that his wife Janet was not breathing came under scrutiny almost immediately during the call he initially claimed that she had suffered gunshot wounds when emergency responders arrived at the aboa residence they found Janet dead from multiple stab

wounds directly contradicting Raven's assertion of a shooting this discrepancy raised immediate suspicions among investigators regarding the accuracy of 's claims the inconsistencies did not end there initially Raven was cooperative with investigators however as the investigation progressed he informed Janet's family that she had committed suicide this claim was met with skepticism by her family who knew Janet's character and strong religious beliefs against taking her own life Raven provided conflicting statements to law enforcement too he initially stated that he found Janet already dead but later claimed she was alive and had asked him why it hurts so

much yet during his his call with the 911 dispatcher he did not ask for help for Janet but rather informed them that she had been shot these inconsistencies in his narrative further fueled suspicion about his involvement in Janet's murder shortly after Janet's death Raven moved to Utah with their son Kaden his decision to leave North Carolina raised eyebrows among investigators furthermore he attempted to claim the life insurance payout for Janet even before her funeral which added to the growing concerns regarding his motives during the investigation investigators discovered that Raven had backed up all data from

his laptop to CDs just one day before the murder on the 25th of April 2005 this timing was particularly suspicious and raised questions about his intentions leading up to Janet's death while sorting through belongings following the murder Janet's sister found these discs containing Vital Information backed up just before the incident the discovery of this evidence suggested potential premeditation on Raven's part and contributed to the Moun case against him in 2008 Raven married Vanessa Pond a single mother whose daughter attended the same daycare as his son Kaden initially Vanessa was hesitant about entering a relationship with

Raven but he persistently pursued her Charming her with his attention and care for her child he presented himself as a devoted father and partner which helped him gain Vanessa's trust however troubling patterns soon emerged that mirrored those seen in his first marriage to Janet reports indicated that Raven exhibited AB abusive behaviors similar to those he had displayed during his marriage to Janet allegations of controlling behavior and emotional manipulation surfaced raising alarms among those close to Vanessa friends and family members noted that Vanessa began to withdraw from her support network and became increasingly isolated as Raven

exerted control over her life ultimately Vanessa's marriage to Raven ended due to these allegations of abuse this cycle of behavior highlighted a disturbing pattern that seemed to follow Raven into his new relationships suggesting unresolved issues from his past and an inability to maintain Healthy Partnerships in the months following Janet eo's murder the investigation faced significant challenges despite the initial suspicions surrounding her husband Raven aboa there was no direct evidence linking him to the crime investigators found a bloody shoeprint and a fingerprint at the crime scene but neither matched Ravens this lack of concrete evidence hindered

the prosecution's ability to build a strong case against him but additionally Raven's Alibi for the night of the murder was confirmed by multiple Witnesses who saw him at a soccer match in Morrisville while this Alibi initially appeared to exonerate him it also complicated the investigation as detectives struggled to reconcile his presence at the game with the timeline of Janet's death As Time passed and leads dwindled the case went cold until detective Charles Soul took over in late 2009 Soul was determined to reexamine all aspects of the investigation with fresh eyes he meticulously reviewed the evidence

collected during the initial inquiry and began focusing on inconsistencies in Raven's statements and behavior detective Soul also began questioning whether Janet had been wearing her contact lenses at the time of her death he theorized that if she was prepared for bed but still had her contacts in it would contradict Raven's narrative that she was murdered shortly after he left for soccer practice to investigate this Theory further Soul decided that exhuming Janet's body might provide crucial evidence the exam was necessary to determine if she had been indeed wearing her contact lenses when she died which provided

a clear timeline of events leading up to her murder in early 2010 Janet's body was exuded from a cemetery in Pennsylvania during the examination investigators confirmed that she had died with her contact lenses still in her eyes this finding suggested that she had not been preparing for bed as Raven claimed but rather was likely attacked shortly after he left for the soccer match the results of this exam were significant they not only contradicted Raven's timeline but also indicated potential premeditation on his part the presence of her contact lenses suggests that Janet was caught off guard

raising further questions about Raven's involvement in her murder as detective Soul pieced together these elements Raven's inconsistent statements his suspicious Behavior after Janet's death and now the evidence from the exam all signs pointed towards his culpability the inconsistencies in Raven's narrative became increasingly difficult to ignore with mounting evidence suggesting Foul Play and a growing belief that Raven had orchestrated his wife's murder authorities prepared to take decisive action the stage was set for an arrest that would finally bring Justice for Janet abaroa on February 1st 2010 Raven abaroa was rested in Idaho on charges of first-degree

murder in connection with the death of his wife Janet aboa this arrest followed lengthy investigation that revealed inconsistencies in his statements and suspicious Behavior surrounding the circumstances of Janet's murder the investigation raised significant doubts about Raven's credibility and involvement in the crime ultimately leading law enforcement to take decisive action against him in April 2013 the highly anticipated trial of Raven aboa commenced lasting for 5 weeks the trial attracted significant media attention due to the nature of the crime and the complexity surrounding the case the prosecution presented a robust case built primarily on circumstantial evidence they

called over 80 witnesses to testify including friends and family members Who provided insights into Raven's violent behavior and manipulative Tendencies key testimonies included accounts from women who had experienced Raven's abusive Behavior firsthand these Witnesses described instances of emotional manipulation and aggression painting a picture of a man capable of committing such a heinous act one notable witness was Janet's close friend who testified about Janet's fears regarding Raven's unpredictable outbursts and her concerns for her safety this testimony aimed to establish a motive rooted in Raven's abusive Behavior and the deteriorating state of their marriage the prosecution also

highlighted critical evidence from the crime scene indicating the absence of forced entry which suggested that Janet likely knew her as salent they argued that Raven's actions following Janet's murder such as moving to Utah with their son Caden and attempting to claim a life Insurance payouts were indicative of guilt in contrast the defense focused on the lack of direct evidence linking Raven to the murder they argued that the prosecution relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and emotional testimonies rather than concrete proof the defense highlighted that there were no fingerprints or shoeprints matching Raven found at the crime

scene undermining the prosecution's claims additionally they emphasized Ravens confirmed Alibi multiple Witnesses corroborated his presence at a soccer match during the time of Janet's murder this Alibi was crucial for the defense as it suggested that he could not have been at home when the crime occurred the defense also pointed out inconsistencies and witness testimonies and questioned the reliability of those who claim to have seen or heard anything suspicious on the night of the Murder By focusing on these gaps and evidence they aimed to create Reasonable Doubt in the minds of the jurors by May 2013

after five long weeks of testimony and deliberation the trial concluded with a hung jury the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict with 11 jurors voting guilty while one maintained innocence this deadlock resulted in a mistrial leaving both sides frustrated and uncertain about what would happen next the outcome highlighted the complexities of the case despite compelling circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution the lack of direct evidence linking Raven to Janet's murder ultimately prevented a conviction the mistrial also pointed towards deeply divided opinions regarding Raven's guilt or innocence setting the stage for further legal proceedings

in what would become a protracted battle for justice as discussions about a potential retrial began both sides braced for what lay ahead knowing that this was far from Over the trial had raised more questions than answers leaving Janet's family seeking closure and justice for their loved ones tragic death following the mistrial in 2013 discussions about a potential plea deal began between the prosecution and defense as both sides sought to evaluate new evidence that had emerged during the invest investigation one of the key pieces of evidence that the prosecution felt might sway the jury in the

retrial was the report of Janet Abo's body aimation conducted in July 2010 among all the inconsistencies Raven had put forward the biggest one was related to Janet's contact lenses his claim that Janet was getting ready to go to bed was proven Wrong by the exhumation report when it was confirmed that there were still fragments of contact lenses in her eyes so as per detective Soul's theory if she had not removed the lenses she was not yet ready for bed and if she was not ready for bed it meant she was attacked and killed shortly after

Raven left for his soccer match hence the whole scenario would fall onto Raven that maybe it was Raven who pretended to go out for a football match and locked up the dog so there wouldn't be any protection for Janet he then came back inside the house and since Janet knew it was him there were no signs of forced entry or call for help which she would have done in the case of an intruder he then committed the murder and left for the football match which confirmed his Alibi upon his return He would make a 911

call where he described his wife as dead but later changed his stance and said that she was alive upon his arrival although all of this was speculative evidence based on Theory and there was no match found of the bloody footprint or the fingerprint of the crime scene it was looking likely that if another trial were to take place the jury would be swayed towards declaring him guilty of first-degree murder on March 12th 2014 Raven aboa entered an Alfred plea for voluntary manslaughter in connection with the death of his wife Janet aboa this plea allowed him

to acknowledge that sufficient evidence existed for a conviction without admitting guilt the decision to accept this plea deal came after extensive discussions between the prosecution and defense following the mistrial in 2013 the terms of the Alfred police stipulated that Raven would plead guilty to voluntary manslaughter which is a lesser charge than first-degree murder this charge typically indicates that while the defendant did not intend to kill there was a significant degree of recklessness or negligence involved in their actions that led to someone's death by accepting this plea Raven effectively acknowledged that the evidence against him was

strong enough to likely result in a conviction if the case went to trial again the acceptance of the Alfred plea was influenced by several factors after the mistrial both sides recognized the challenge of pursuing another trial the prosecution needed to ensure a conviction without risking another hung jury while the defense sought to mitigate potential sentencing outcomes for Raven as part of the plea agreement Raven was sentenced to 8 to 10 years in prison but received credit for time served approximately 4 years meaning he would serve a reduced sentence the sentencing reflected the seriousness of Janet's

death while also considering Raven's acceptance of responsibility Through The Plea accepting the voluntary manslaughter charge allowed Raven to avoid a more severe sentence associated with first-degree murder which carries harsher penalties and reflects premeditated intent by pleading guilty to voluntary manslaughter he could maintain this innocence publicly while acknowledging that his actions contributed to Janet's death this strategic move likely aimed to reduce public scrutiny and provide some measure of closure for both families involved ultimately this plea agreement marked a pivotal Moment In the case Closing one chapter while leaving lingering questions about Justice for Janet aboa and

the implications of domestic violence within relationships the acceptance of the Alfred plea demonstrated how legal strategies can shape outcomes in highstakes criminal cases cases particularly when direct evidence is lacking but circumstantial evidence is compelling enough to influence decisions made by both prosecutors and defendants on Christmas day December 25th 2017 Raven abaroa was released from prison after serving time for his Alfred plea of voluntary manslaughter in connection with the death of his wife Janet aboa upon his release he moved back to Utah where he sought to rebuild his life following the tumultuous events surrounding Janet's murder

in the wake of Janet's tragic death and the subsequent legal proceedings her family remained deeply affected by the outcomes of the case they felt that Justice had not been adequately served for Janet's murder and continued to advocate for victims of domestic violence Janet aboa story has since been utilized as an example in training law enforcement regarding domestic violence investigations her case serves as a critical reminder of the complexities involved in such situations and the importance of thorough investigations when dealing with potential domestic abuse cases law enforcement agencies have Incorporated Lessons Learned From Janet's tragic experience

into their training programs to better equip officers in recognizing signs of domestic violence and responding appropriately through these efforts Janet's Legacy continues to impact lives beyond her own highlighting the urgent need for awareness and advocacy in the fight against domestic violence her family's commitment to this case underscores their belief that no one should endure what Janet experienced and they strive to ensure that her story contributes positively to Future Generations whether Raven abaroa was directly involved or not the investigations could not prove that yet many out there believe that his behavior towards Janet before the incidents

the infidelity the relationship with a miner the abuse and unpredictable outbursts of anger were enough to prove his guilt his inconsistencies and claims he put forward to law enforcement his actions after her death the fact that he ran away to Utah tried to present the entire case as a suicide and his attempt to withdraw Janet's life insurance money even before the funeral could not have all been coincidences furthermore the fact that the same abuse and unpredictable patterns of anger repeated in his second marriage also raised severe concerns about whether the law system made the right

call by allowing him to go into a plea agreement and giving him a lenient charge regardless of it all Raven is living his life as a free man largely on the back of no direct evidence being found against him do you think he was the main culprit in his wife's brutal murder and was the decision to find him not guilty the right one from a jury considering a plethora of circumstantial evidence and testimonies against him let us know your thoughts in the comments below